Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Your Brand, Our Creativity!
RanaDerana On-line
Updated:
Yesterday at 12:40 PM
Toyota Vitz scp10 For Sale
Lakmal Bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:50 AM
Kandy
Welcome all my all new pet shop Bark.lk
dilumrane
Updated:
Monday at 12:26 PM
Windows RDP Only Rs.500 a month
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Sunday at 12:41 PM
Ad icon
V2ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Oct 22, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Help
ECON danna kollo mehe warella... HELP
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tom Riddle" data-source="post: 7309655" data-attributes="member: 47610"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue">You are not answering the question. Are you saying that the author is incorrect in saying that Arc elasticity and mid point elasticity are similar in nature to warrant being combined and stated as one name. Do you have a different article which states that they are different. And what the Wikipedia article says is logical, what you say is not, which makes it that much harder to believe you.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue">But I will qualify my statement - I have no prior experience on 'arc elasticity' and 'mid-point elasticity'</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue">We are not discussing the reliability of Internet sources. I have given you 4 sources which show that MC can be calculated using differentials. There are obviously very many more. As opposed to you who says that you have never even <em>seen</em> anything like that. If you want to criticise the sources, you should have evidence which states that the differential method is incorrect. That's what makes criticism constructive. What you are doing now is refusing to believe when it is staring at you in the face. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue">The only defense you have is, it was on the Internet, so we can't believe it. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Blue">And about the proverb, I guess the sarcasm was lost on you. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tom Riddle, post: 7309655, member: 47610"] [SIZE="4"][COLOR="Blue"]You are not answering the question. Are you saying that the author is incorrect in saying that Arc elasticity and mid point elasticity are similar in nature to warrant being combined and stated as one name. Do you have a different article which states that they are different. And what the Wikipedia article says is logical, what you say is not, which makes it that much harder to believe you. But I will qualify my statement - I have no prior experience on 'arc elasticity' and 'mid-point elasticity' We are not discussing the reliability of Internet sources. I have given you 4 sources which show that MC can be calculated using differentials. There are obviously very many more. As opposed to you who says that you have never even [I]seen[/I] anything like that. If you want to criticise the sources, you should have evidence which states that the differential method is incorrect. That's what makes criticism constructive. What you are doing now is refusing to believe when it is staring at you in the face. The only defense you have is, it was on the Internet, so we can't believe it. And about the proverb, I guess the sarcasm was lost on you. [/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom