Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranhiru" data-source="post: 3670833" data-attributes="member: 17748">And machan Wikipedia is not something that  u can just add anything just because you want to... Will Encyclopedia Britannica keep information about how big your home is?? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" /> Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and the difference is that ANYONE can of course write about anything but should be worthy enough to be kept in an encyclopedia with proper and valid sources! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" /> So good luck mate! Im not trying to bring you down...you had the same motive which i had of giving ElaKiri some prominent place in Wikipedia... but see what Scientizzle (one mod of Wikipedia has told to me)I deleted <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ElaKiri.com&action=edit&redlink=1" target="_blank">ElaKiri.com</a> because it met the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#G11" target="_blank">criteria for speedy deletion</a>. It was written like an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SPAM" target="_blank">advertisement</a> and was wholely inappropriate in tone. I'll restore the article at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ranhiru/ElaKiri.com&action=edit&redlink=1" target="_blank">User:Ranhiru/ElaKiri.com</a> so you can work on it--be sure to read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WEB" target="_blank">WP:WEB</a>, the notability guideline for articles on websites, and the links in the welcome message above. — <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scientizzle" target="_blank">Scien</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scientizzle" target="_blank">tizzle</a> 22:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ranhiru/ElaKiri.com&action=edit&redlink=1" target="_blank">User:Ranhiru/ElaKiri.com</a> is definitely an improvement on the original article. There isn't, however, any <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CITE" target="_blank">sourcing</a> of the claims of notability. Without links to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS" target="_blank">reliable external sources</a>, the article fail the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:V" target="_blank">verifiability policy</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N" target="_blank">notability guidleines</a>. If the site has been covered in any news media, definitely <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FOOTNOTE" target="_blank">cite</a> the articles. — <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scientizzle" target="_blank">Scien</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scientizzle" target="_blank">tizzle</a> 17:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Then i got sick of it! A lot of people helped me to do the article but finally it didnt turn out to be a good one...It appears that you have not worked on the article for some time. I am going to delete it as userspace is an appropriate place to actively work on an article to get it up to standard, but not a place to park an inappropriate article (i.e., spam). Come by my user talk page if you come back and wish to resume working on the article--I'll restore it then. — <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scientizzle" target="_blank">Scien</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scientizzle" target="_blank">tizzle</a> 22:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)</blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom