Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
vgp
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:10 AM
එක පැකේජ් එකයි මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet. තාමත් DATA CARD දාන්න සල්ලි වියදම් කරනවද? අඩුම මිලට අපෙන්.
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:30 PM
Ad icon
ඉන්ටර්නෙට් එකෙන් හරියටම සල්ලි හොයන්න සහ Success වෙන්න කැමතිද? 🚀 (E-Money & Success Stories)
siri sumana
Updated:
May 30, 2026
Gemini AI PRO 18 months Offer
Hawaka
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Ad icon
koko account
DasunEranga
Updated:
May 27, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Election!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="don03" data-source="post: 11265700" data-attributes="member: 275887"><p>The thing ppl must understand is, yes MR administration has some negativity..high expenditure n all, but <strong>the solution to defeat MR is not to elect SF or RW</strong>, none of them have the political capabilities MR has, ppl must find a better person than MR to replace him. SF is a great army commander, still he can lead an army for a victory, but he never can be a great civil leader also he is a fertile politician. RW is a good economist & a great gentlemen but has no backbone & many other things a leader needs.</p><p></p><p>Ppl voted for MR not because he is the greatest leader ever but we all were in a dilemma of selecting the <strong>least worse</strong>, so MR fit the bill. I would be more than happy if a better leader comes up from the mass to compete with MR but till then whether we like it or not he will be in power & we all might have to bare this high living cost.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="don03, post: 11265700, member: 275887"] The thing ppl must understand is, yes MR administration has some negativity..high expenditure n all, but [B]the solution to defeat MR is not to elect SF or RW[/B], none of them have the political capabilities MR has, ppl must find a better person than MR to replace him. SF is a great army commander, still he can lead an army for a victory, but he never can be a great civil leader also he is a fertile politician. RW is a good economist & a great gentlemen but has no backbone & many other things a leader needs. Ppl voted for MR not because he is the greatest leader ever but we all were in a dilemma of selecting the [B]least worse[/B], so MR fit the bill. I would be more than happy if a better leader comes up from the mass to compete with MR but till then whether we like it or not he will be in power & we all might have to bare this high living cost. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom