Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hyaenidae" data-source="post: 20385055" data-attributes="member: 530392">Is this even a valid argument? Who said japanese cars are 100% safe? Going by this logic cars having safety features and rigid bodyframes + Reinforced bodyshells is useless <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /> because they are not 100% safe. As I said before, driving a car with 0 safty rating and an unstable bodyshell is like riding a motorcycle without an helmet.I don't know why you're so extreme.When someone try to explain you the proven fact that Japanese vehicles are safer than their Indian counterparts, your counter-argument is "No car is 100% safe!"When someone try to explain you the proven fact that Japanese vehicles last longer than their Indian counterparts your counter-argument is "No car is  immortal!"And you proudly say you have successfully defended the KWID from "false propaganda" made by the "KWID haters". <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/dull.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":dull:" title="Dull    :dull:" data-shortname=":dull:" />It's too early to say if the KWIDs' metal quality and corrosion prevention measures are  adequate in real-world conditions. Let's give it some time and see.Seriously, having a stable bodyshell has become a "luxury option" nowadays huh? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> KWID failed the crash test and scored 0 points even if it had an AirBag installed because of the sub-par quality of the metal used by Renault to build the bodyshell. I don't quite follow the last sentence (in bold) can you please elaborate?Show me a Maruti in pristine condition with 200k mileage on ikman and I'll believe you. He says indian dashboards are made from cheap plastics to reduce cost, and I agree with him after seeing Japanese cars older than 15 years having better dashboards than the 2016 KWID. But I agree expecting premium quality plastics in an indian budget car is fruitless. So am I to believe a manufacturer using sub-par quality metal for the bodyshell of the car used better quality metal on vehicle's outer body? Reliablility of the KWID's outer metal parts  is yet to be proven under real-world conditions because there are no KWIDs more than a year old.Maruti failed in this regard. Let's see how Renault does.I'm yet to see a 5-year Maruti without a rust spot on its exhaust. That's the reason for me saying Maruti failed in rust-protection of their cars. It's too early to say how the renault would cope.</blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom