Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ela_eluwa120" data-source="post: 12355101" data-attributes="member: 193664">I think your argument is simply saying that a given mortal is not free if God does interfere with his actions. But, it seems that this argument is also consistent with the statement "Eventhough God can interfere with mortals' actions, God does not interfere with mortals' actions".  Omnipotence simply says that God can interfere with mortals' actions. Omnipotence implies nothing about whether or not God does interfere with mortals' actions. So, mortals' have freewill if God choose not to interfere with mortals' actions. Since it is up to God to decide whether or not he is going to interfere, it follows that the mere non-interference of God is not a sufficient reason to believe "free-will invalidates omnipotence".</blockquote>

Top Bottom