Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dinukap4" data-source="post: 6986129" data-attributes="member: 88060"> new specifications and details about the Geforce GTX 480 and GTX470 is out from <a href="http://semiaccurate.com/2010/02/20/semiaccurate-gets-some-gtx480-scores/" target="_blank">semiaccurate.com</a> as below: There are two cards, the GTX480 having the full complement of 512 shaders, and the GTX470 with only 448 shaders . The clocks for the GTX480 are either 600MHz or 625MHz for the low or half clock, and double that, 1200MHz or 1250MHz for the high or hot clock. Nvidia was aiming for 750/1500MHz last spring, so this is a huge miss. This speed is the first point the sources conflict on, and it could go either way, since both sources were adamant about theirs being the correct final clock. On the GTX470 side, there are 448 shaders, and the clocks are set at 625MHz and 1250MHz in both cases. If the GTX480 is really at 600Mhz and 1200MHz, and the GTX470 is slightly faster, it should really make you wonder about the thermals of the chip. Basically Nvidia has to crank the voltages beyond what it wanted to keep borderline transistors from flaking out. The problem is that this creates heat, and a lot of heat. Both of our sources said that their cards were smoking hot. One said they measured it at 70C at idle on the 2D clock. <a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9vgJ1nwu_xA/S4KHM2tSdpI/AAAAAAAACNw/32HP2vZeTtU/s1600-h/nvidia_logo.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_9vgJ1nwu_xA/S4KHM2tSdpI/AAAAAAAACNw/32HP2vZeTtU/s200/nvidia_logo.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></a> Now that you know the raw clocks, how does it perform? It is a mixed bag, but basically the cards are much below Nvidia's original expectations publicly stated as 60 percent faster than Cypress. The numbers that SemiAccurate were told span a variety of current games, all running at very high resolutions.. The GTX480 with 512 shaders running at full speed, 600Mhz or 625MHz depending on which source, ran on average 5 percent faster than a Cypress HD5870, plus or minus a little bit. The sources were not allowed to test the GTX470, which is likely an admission that it will be slower than the Cypress HD5870. There is one bright spot, and it is a very bright spot indeed. No, not the thermal cap of the chip, but the tessellation performance in Heaven."   Read more: <a href="http://www.guruht.com/2010/02/geforce-gtx-480gtx470-specifications.html#ixzz0i7oA6qGl" target="_blank">http://www.guruht.com/2010/02/geforce-gtx-480gtx470-specifications.html#ixzz0i7oA6qGl</a> </blockquote>

Verification: Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom