Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Good answers for good questions!!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sudunone" data-source="post: 6180165" data-attributes="member: 205934"><p>A bhikkhu is a person who has left a lay life-which means, he should not have an occupation, such as a post of MP, and if he is a fully ordained monk, should not touch money-so he cannot accept a salary. Do I make myself clear? </p><p></p><p>The vinaya rules were introduced as and when required. Initially, those who became monks were those who were focused on finding a solution to dukkha, or focused on nirvana. But later on people joined the Sangha community for various gains. These people were not focused on spiritual development and various rules had to be implemented.</p><p></p><p>As far as I know, monks of that day, didn't enter politics- India was ruled by kings, whose crown passed from one king to his child. So 'politics' as we have today, didn't exist. But Buddha has stated that monks should not engage in trades or handle money. </p><p></p><p>But since the Buddhist monks depend on lay people for their needs (food, robes, dwellings, medication) they should repay by teaching dhamma to lay people, engaging them in good deeds and providing proper guidance to lay people.</p><p></p><p>Since their main aim is to attain nirvana, in my opinion, they cannot engage in full-time politics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sudunone, post: 6180165, member: 205934"] A bhikkhu is a person who has left a lay life-which means, he should not have an occupation, such as a post of MP, and if he is a fully ordained monk, should not touch money-so he cannot accept a salary. Do I make myself clear? The vinaya rules were introduced as and when required. Initially, those who became monks were those who were focused on finding a solution to dukkha, or focused on nirvana. But later on people joined the Sangha community for various gains. These people were not focused on spiritual development and various rules had to be implemented. As far as I know, monks of that day, didn't enter politics- India was ruled by kings, whose crown passed from one king to his child. So 'politics' as we have today, didn't exist. But Buddha has stated that monks should not engage in trades or handle money. But since the Buddhist monks depend on lay people for their needs (food, robes, dwellings, medication) they should repay by teaching dhamma to lay people, engaging them in good deeds and providing proper guidance to lay people. Since their main aim is to attain nirvana, in my opinion, they cannot engage in full-time politics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom