Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Good answers for good questions!!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wal Bada" data-source="post: 6200759" data-attributes="member: 654"><p>OK Lets start it. Both of us are in blind faith.</p><p>Now you are trying to say Quran > Tipitaka. Yes, that is blind faith. Yor <strong>logical</strong> explanation is derived from Quran which is <strong>non-sense</strong> to me. Now you might feel vice versa. The fact is existence of Allah cannot be proved with concrete evidence other than using the Quran. If you think it is correct, why not proving reincarnation using Tipitaka. </p><p></p><p>Why one God? why not many? I have raised this many times, but you never came up with a intelligible answer. </p><p></p><p>The same universe / human being etc. have great flaws in the systems. Flawed creation -> Flawed creator? If the creator was the nature then flaws can be accepted. If it the prefect God flaws cannot be accepted.</p><p>Your ulterior motives are so clear cut. When this question was answered many times, you have brought his up once more. <span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: DarkRed">You can argue to show there is no reincarnation. But I'll use every single argument of yours to show that there is no Allah</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wal Bada, post: 6200759, member: 654"] OK Lets start it. Both of us are in blind faith. Now you are trying to say Quran > Tipitaka. Yes, that is blind faith. Yor [B]logical[/B] explanation is derived from Quran which is [B]non-sense[/B] to me. Now you might feel vice versa. The fact is existence of Allah cannot be proved with concrete evidence other than using the Quran. If you think it is correct, why not proving reincarnation using Tipitaka. Why one God? why not many? I have raised this many times, but you never came up with a intelligible answer. The same universe / human being etc. have great flaws in the systems. Flawed creation -> Flawed creator? If the creator was the nature then flaws can be accepted. If it the prefect God flaws cannot be accepted. Your ulterior motives are so clear cut. When this question was answered many times, you have brought his up once more. [SIZE="4"][COLOR="DarkRed"]You can argue to show there is no reincarnation. But I'll use every single argument of yours to show that there is no Allah[/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom