Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="djiresh" data-source="post: 18336327" data-attributes="member: 41540">බෑන්ඩ්විත් එක අඩු කරලා පවර් සේව් කරන්න බැරි බව දන්නවා. ඒත් අඩු මෙමේරි බැන්ඩ්විත් එක තියන පාර්ටිශන් එක විතරක් ඇක්සෙස් කරන්න පුලුවන් අඩු ප්වර් එකකින්. අනික තමා ප්‍රදාන බෙන්ච්මාර්ක් සයිට් ඔක්කොම වගේ කිය්න්නේ මේ ගානට තියන හොඳම කාඩ් එකක් කියලා. දැන් උඹ කියන්නේ උන් කියන්නේ බොරු කියලද? Toms Hardware Verdict <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-specifications,28464.html" target="_blank">http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-geforce-gtx-970-specifications,28464.html</a>I’m not omniscient. I don’t know if Nvidia knew about this and chose to keep it close to its chest, or if the company found out with the rest of us last Friday. But I have no good reason to believe the company is lying. To tell the truth, from a practical standpoint, I’m not sure if it matters.That’s not to say I think it’s OK to be fed misinformation about GPU specifications. This is a subject I am patently passionate about. I think it’s important for the technical press to have the right information at its disposal when analyzing hardware and deciphering the repercussions of what goes on under the hood. Nvidia needs to work hard to make sure this kind of mistake never happens again.But from a purely practical standpoint, this doesn’t really change anything for the end user. The GeForce GTX 970 remains one of the best graphics card buys on the market. It performs the same way it did at launch — which is really good. As such, we will continue to recommend it until there is a better-performing option for the price.ExtremeTech Verdict<a href="http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/199684-nvidia-slapped-with-class-action-lawsuit-over-gtx-970-memory-issues" target="_blank">http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/199684-nvidia-slapped-with-class-action-lawsuit-over-gtx-970-memory-issues</a>The vast majority of customers who bought a GTX 970 will not be materially impacted by the limits on the card’s performance — but people who bought a pair of them in SLI configurations may have a solid argument for how Nvidia’s failure to market the card properly led them to purchase the wrong product. It’s also fair to note that this issue could change competitive multi-GPU standings. AMD’s R9 290X starts $10 below the GTX 970 at NewEgg, but has none of the same memory limitations. The GTX 970 is still a potent card, even with these limitations and caveats, but it’s not quite as strong as it seemed on launch day — and there are obviously some Nvidia customers who feel mislead.t’s only fitting then that with the GTX 970 now up and running we find ourselves in a virtual tie between NVIDIA and AMD. Despite not even being NVIDIA’s flagship GM204 card, the GTX 970 is still fast enough to race the R9 290X to a dead heat – at 1440p the GTX 970 averages just 1% faster than the R9 290X. Only at 4K can AMD’s flagship pull ahead, and even then the situation becomes reversed entirely in NVIDIA’s favor at 1080p. As such the R9 290X still has a niche of its own, but considering the fact that GTX 970 is a $329 card I don’t seriously expect it to be used for 4K gaming, so the 1440p and 1080p comparisons are going to be the most appropriate comparisons here.Anandtech Verdict<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/8568/the-geforce-gtx-970-review-feat-evga/17" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/show/8568/the-geforce-gtx-970-review-feat-evga/17</a>As is the case with AMD/NVIDIA ties in the past, this is an anything-but-equal sort of situation, but it strongly sells the idea of just how fast the GTX 970 is and just how dangerous it is to AMD. Ultimately what you are going to find is that the GTX 970 scores some big leads in some games only to fall well behind the R9 290X in others, and in other games still the two cards are tied through and through. In the end for pure performance neither card is superior, and in this case that’s a huge victory for NVIDIA.PC Gamer Verdict<a href="http://www.pcgamer.com/the-best-graphics-cards/" target="_blank">http://www.pcgamer.com/the-best-graphics-cards/</a>Testing has brought to light the fact that the GTX 970 encounters performance issues when using all 4GB of its VRAM, due to the card's memory architecture. This problem wasn't obvious in regular usage and the review process because the 970 typically performed extremely well running games at reasonable settings (primarily gaming at 1080p and 1440p). Pushing the card to use all 4GB VRAM, by running games at 4K or with maximum anti-aliasing There's a reason why the memory issue didn't show up in positive initial reviews of the card like ours: you have to go far out of your way, and run the card at resolutions/settings it's not really capable of handling, to spot any issues with its memory management. If you're still suspicious/confused about the 970's performance, read Digital Foundry's excellent breakdown of the controversy. It's a great, informative read.The fact remains that the GTX 970's overall performance is fantastic for the price. It's not the card we recommend for 4K gaming or extreme performance. For most gamers, we still think this is the best value available.PC-world VerdictDespite these shortcomings, however, the GTX 970 still delivers an amazing amount of bang for your buck. The difference now, as AnandTech points out, is that we have a better understanding of the card's strengths and weaknesses. While the issues introduced by the memory design may only be bumped into in edge cases, they may sway gamers who want to play at very high resolutions and/or with anti-aliasing settings cranked to the max to consider AMD's Radeon cards, as those situations require more memory than typical gaming scenarios.උඹ කියන කතාව ඇත්ත. ඔය කාඩ් එකේ මෙමරි එක බැන්ඩ්විත් 2 කට පාර්ටිශන් කරලා එන්නේ. එවුනට AMD R9 290X එක්ක කරට කර ඉන්න හොඳ වැලියු එකක් තියන කාඩ් එකක්. විශේෂයෙන්ම පවර් යූස් එක අඩු නිසා. ටොම්ස් හාර්ඩ්වෙයාර් බෙස්ට් බයි කියලත් රෙකම්න්ඩ් කරා ඕක. ගන්න එපා කියල කියන්න බෑ මචන්. දැනුවත්ව ගන්න කියපන්.</blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom