Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Saturday at 8:07 AM
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri PRO!
Has it ever been proved that gravity is proportional to mass?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="djHiran" data-source="post: 5324290" data-attributes="member: 6429"><p>Gravity being directly proportional to the mass of a body is only an assumption in Newtonian physics. r-girl, thats exactly what I meant. here we can start by formulating an equation for the force between two bodies A and B with masses M and m respectively.</p><p></p><p>Force F = G*M*m*(1/r)^2</p><p></p><p>Where r is the Newtonian distance (distance at rest) between A and B.</p><p></p><p>Here G is the proportionality constant.</p><p></p><p>As to what R-Girl says, G*M*(1/r)^2 = 9.81 m/s^2 and is the notion most of us generally accept. The fact is this 'magical' number is only an experimental measurement, and is subject to a certain error (error theoretically).</p><p></p><p>We carry out our calculations based on the assumption, and end up with reasonable results. But it is not logical to think that our assumption is correct.</p><p></p><p>For example, one can say that we stand on the inner surface of a sphere. Based on that assumption one may easily conclude that we can travel all around the world and eventually reach our starting point. Can you conclude that our assumption is correct?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="djHiran, post: 5324290, member: 6429"] Gravity being directly proportional to the mass of a body is only an assumption in Newtonian physics. r-girl, thats exactly what I meant. here we can start by formulating an equation for the force between two bodies A and B with masses M and m respectively. Force F = G*M*m*(1/r)^2 Where r is the Newtonian distance (distance at rest) between A and B. Here G is the proportionality constant. As to what R-Girl says, G*M*(1/r)^2 = 9.81 m/s^2 and is the notion most of us generally accept. The fact is this 'magical' number is only an experimental measurement, and is subject to a certain error (error theoretically). We carry out our calculations based on the assumption, and end up with reasonable results. But it is not logical to think that our assumption is correct. For example, one can say that we stand on the inner surface of a sphere. Based on that assumption one may easily conclude that we can travel all around the world and eventually reach our starting point. Can you conclude that our assumption is correct? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom