Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BRAINY" data-source="post: 6091637" data-attributes="member: 68727">1. Then sorry for the first sentence and congratulations. The reason for saying that was, from your posts I've got a good picture about you as aintelligent guy and I liked to see you excelled in yout studies. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" />2. LNW Matter : It's a matter of your inability to undersatnd the use and the difference between a FORUM and a site recognized as publishing news.Anyone can discuss any issue within the limits of that forum and according to my knowledge posting that specific article in EK for open conversation was a not against the rules. It was NOT the first incident that a member quoted a news article from a NEWS site. I can't educate the Swarnavahini people on this regard and it's the sole responsibilty of that specific site to give reliable news. And for your information I am not a professional journalist or a inquiry officer to do inquires about news published in media. Ther authorized perosonal willl do the needful and meanwhile kindly keep in your mind that, Anyone can make 'PORA-TALKS' about getting legal actions. Butwhen it come to justice, the law is equal for every citizen {literally of course <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />}. If the Swarnavahini wants to take legal actions, I don't think that the lawyers are not Dum*as*es and they know the Llaw. Keep in your  mind that I didnt plant/make that news here in EK.If you say that it tarnished the image of Elakiri, Can't help. It's your attitude. And according my POV they gave a great publicity to ELAKIRI.COM in their prime time by showing that thread.If you have watched that news clip which was posted in elakiri, you should have noticed that they haven't mentioned anything about the Elakiri.com or the member who published that thread quoting the LNW article and what they said was they were going to take legal actions AGAINST THE PEOPLE WHO MAKING FALSE NEWS ABOUT THEIR COMPANY, SVARNAVAHINI. Since the EK or the member who published that article, in that case it was me, BRAINY, how they can take legal actions against us. They were referring to that original news site, THAT IS: LNW. I dont want to comment on further about this, Already I've talked this issue with GTRZ and published a thread expressing my opinion about this. I don't want to change the peoples' attitude toward me. And even I don't care about that. "THE REALITY IS DEFINED BY THE MIND WHO OBSERVES IT !" <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/cool.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":cool:" title="Cool    :cool:" data-shortname=":cool:" />3. I don't see any connection between putting foolish comments and the USER NAME. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> User name is just a name and the identity of online personality. It doesn't represent anyone or relates it with anyone/anything else. The behavior of that online character would make (online) personality of the member who uses it.4. Already Answered. Adjectives are JUST adjectives who cares. IT IS THE CYBERSPACE. MIND YOU ! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />Please ignore any gramatical or spelling mistakes; I didn't read it again ...</blockquote>

Verification: Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom