Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GuneBhai" data-source="post: 11984153" data-attributes="member: 385820">The Quran that we have today is compiled during the Caliphate of  Othman. Othman started his Caliphate in 644 C.E.  By that time the two  wars between the Persians and the Romans were over and the victors in  each case had already been known.  What are the chances that the verses  2-4 of Sura 30 that says first the Romans will be defeated and a few  years later they will become victorious were altered because the  original verses pronounced by Muhammad were wrong? Of course if what Muhammad had said had been wrong, Othman would not  have allowed it to be published, which would have shown Muhammad to be a  false prophet.  These verses would have been adjusted to reflect what  had actually happened. Othman ordered all other versions that did not match his, to be  destroyed.  Why? It is because they contradicted the one he had put  together.  As the result the evidence is lost.  We can’t prove that  Muhammad was wrong and Muslims can’t claim these verses as prophecy.  It  is absolutely illogical that the compilers would have kept the original  verses when the history had proven Muhammad a false prophet. These verses don’t prove anything because their authenticity is  dubious. However, there are many other verses in the Quran that have  been proven to be wrong.  Consequently, Muslim scholars try to  reinterpret them and twist their meanings.  If there is one error in the  Quran, the book cannot be the word of God. There are thousands of  errors in that book.<a href="http://alisina.org/muhammads-prophecy-of-romans-victory/" target="_blank">http://alisina.org/muhammads-prophecy-of-romans-victory/</a></blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom