Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wal Bada" data-source="post: 5715731" data-attributes="member: 654">Here means where? in SL? Sorry, your rely does not make sense. Sri lanka never depended on Muslims to protect  Buddhism. SL never had ancestors (Buddhist or Sinahalese) from Tibet. tibet observes Mahayana tradition of Buddhism and SL observes "Theravada" tradition. If SL Buddhists need some assistance, historically they have turned to Myanmar or Thailand, not Tibet. learn your history first dude.They have not ruled Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, China, Japan, Vietnam, Cambodia or Korea.Muslims did not rule Tibet, but Dhalai Lama did, and he is a Buddhist. Muslims are a tiny minority in Tibet as well. Your argument of Muslim rulers in tibet protecting Buddhism is one of your imaginations.Proves what? Nothing. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_Muslims" target="_blank">Check it out your self.</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_Muslims" target="_blank"></a></blockquote>

Top Bottom