Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mylanka58" data-source="post: 27040316" data-attributes="member: 556429"><a href="https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#" target="_blank">[ATTACH=full]149473[/ATTACH]</a><a href="https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#" target="_blank">https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#</a><a href="https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#" target="_blank">https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#</a><a href="https://elakiri.com/whatsapp%3A//send?text=http%3A//island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/" target="_blank">https://elakiri.com/whatsapp://send?text=http://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/</a><a href="http://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#respond" target="_blank">http://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/#respond</a>By Chandre Dharmawardana, Canada. The rationale for banning agro-chemicals in May 2021 and “going all organic” was mostly the claimed (but false) “poisoning of the food chain” by “chemicals”. It was well known that organic farming even at its best can only supply a tiny fraction of any nation’s food requirements, unless drastic steps are taken (like halving the population and forcing all to be vegetarians; see <a href="https://www.dh-web.org/green/CD-Mueller-OrganicL.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.dh-web.org/green/CD-Mueller-OrganicL.pdf</a>). Today, having realized the impossibility of providing the vast amount of “organic fertilizer” needed even to get minimal harvests and avert famine, the government has done a knee-jerk purchase of nano-fertilizer from India. A government working in the crisis mode has NOT asked if nano-urea can be a health hazard to farming communities, and instead accepted what the Indians say. The product was launched only on 31st May 2021 and sells in India at about $3-4 for a 500ml bottle. It is claimed that 11,000 farm trials were conducted by the Indian National Agriculture Research System in the preceding years. Looking at the published materiel I suspect that these only looked at yields and did NOT monitor the health of the farming communities. The preceding years even overlapped with the pandemic when health chaos prevailed. Whether with DDT, thalidomide, glyphosate or nuclear waste, the impact on human health requires studies over several generations. With conventional materials, tests on micro-organisms and smaller animals with short life spans provide useful information. But this is not true for nanoparticles as their toxico-kinetic pathways are still quite unknown. Although the Indians say that the nano-urea has been tested for bio-safety and toxicity following Indian government guidelines as well as OECD “international guidelines”, no details have been published. It is an open secret that there are no accepted OECD guidelines for the toxicity of various nanomaterials. The earliest nanourea declared nearly two decades ago in the CN1269774C Chinese patent, other products like the hydroxy-apatite nanourea from SJP university which is a few years old, or the Indian product which is only a few months old, have not been adequately investigated for their environmental and health impact. The claim by the Indians that their product is “eco-friendly” and safe to humans is an unsubstantiated statement, very likely to be false. Nanoparticles are ultra-small. Their size is that of Covid-19 Corona virus particles. Being ultra-small, nanoparticles penetrate into foliage, roots or soil extremely efficiently. These materials, especially when sprayed, can get into human skin, eyes, ears, lungs, intestines etc., and instantly penetrate through epithelial layers into every organ and cell, womb and fetus, brain and neuron, chromosome and gene. They will act with high efficiency becoming hundreds of times more toxic than the parent substance from which the nanomaterial was manufactured. While the nanoparticle penetrates the foliage like a “magic bullet”, their action on soil and leaf organisms, and pollinating insects can be akin to a “cluster bomb” that destroys indiscriminately. Lung inflammation, granuloma, and focal emphysema are found in studies on SiO2 nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles are used in food technology and found to cause chromatin changes in the nucleus of human lung fibroblasts, making changes in gene expression in mouse fetus leading to lung cancers. Silver nanoparticles enter the intestinal mucus barrier and increase oxidative stress, damaging cell membranes, DNA, and chromosomes as well. Even at low concentrations, the toxicological effects of silver nanoparticles become evident, while abnormal cell damage, shrinkage, apoptosis, and skin cancers occur at higher concentrations. <a href="https://island.lk/human-health-and-nano-fertilizers-where-is-the-safety-clothing/" target="_blank">Continue</a></blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom