Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="massina" data-source="post: 1104261" data-attributes="member: 20605">Machan, well I can't agree with you completely. But with some facts, yes I agree.History is a place where we could easily get lost. We can't believe the history completely. but I believe once we open our minds like big blue sky, we can see the truth. I am only replying to the facts that I do not agree...Well yes we can't completely believe that Ramayanaya was a true story. But that doesn't mean that it could be a myth. You are saying that you can't believe anything without proper facts. Which means you can't say that it was just a myth too. because history is under the soil so we have to dig it more deeper. As much as we dig it, we could see the history.How much you say that Dhadumonaraya never existed, even though still there's not enough materialistic evidance, I am not going to be quick to reject the idea of Dhadumonaraya. I'll tell you why.At the time we are talking about, as much as we know there were nothing called Flying sourcers. The first known aircraft which can take humans took place in 1903. Of cource by Wright brothers. But Chinese had the basic technology of helicopter way before even Wright brother's ancestors born. And they used it. If you are a hard core material based believer I give you a good example.Leonardo da Vinci. Do u know he designed a flying soucer in 1502?<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Design_for_a_Flying_Machine.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />He designed it about 400 years ago Wright brothers flew. And referring to that fact, how can you or anyone can possibly say that Dadumonaraya never excised? Also that story came along with Ramayanaya. As we know every story has a reason. How those people even imagined about a flying saucer? How they got that idea?Where was the fountain of it? In this modern world, can we predict about something which doesn't exist right now? At least, we need the idea right?What I basically say is that you should be more open. Just because there's no materialistic evidance to prove it, you can't say it NEVER EXCIST...!Well I give you some links. Read them first. And take your decision.<a href="http://www.rootsweb.com/~lkawgw/adamsbridge.html" target="_blank">http://www.rootsweb.com/~lkawgw/adamsbridge.html</a><a href="http://www.rense.com/general30/nasa.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rense.com/general30/nasa.htm</a><a href="http://premendra.sulekha.com/blog/post/2007/04/hammer-of-upa-left-on-rama-sethu-as-talibani-on-budha.htm" target="_blank">http://premendra.sulekha.com/blog/post/2007/04/hammer-of-upa-left-on-rama-sethu-as-talibani-on-budha.htm</a>Now here, you have done a HUGE Mistake my friend. I believe that you have a knowledge with basic engineering and physical science. And be more logical.The "Physics" you are talking about were made a lot of time after Sigiriya built. You are talking about the physical rule called "Keshakarshanaya". The same way a tree get it's water supply. But my dear friend. Now scientist reject the idea that a rock can have a that kind of power to take a huge water amount up to the rock. Yes now you may say at that time British people also pumped water up to the castles. But my friend you are talking about bricked buildings, I am talking about plumbing a rock...So I kindly request you to give some respect to our ancient people who built those marvelous things. "Mystery" is a thing that difficult to understand. Still engineers can't give a proper explanation how they built Sigiriya. They are having difficulties to understand that. Which means, it's no more than a "mystery".My dear friend...The only thing I have to say is that you are not open minded. You are saying the same story what we hear everywhere. I know very well still we don't have proper evidence. But you can't say my logic is also a false too. Be open....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom