Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sri_lion" data-source="post: 1104604" data-attributes="member: 4103">History is what we know of our past and what is verified from Materialistic evidence! And how do we verify history?1. Physical Evidence Gathered2. They will be tested according to scientific methods to check thier age3. Historians will identify them as unique to thier cultures or not4. Cross reference them to world history to actually see whether it matches or not! example: "King Ashoka sent his son to Sri Lanka with many others to establish Buddhism"To support this saying.. Sri Maha Bodhiya still exist, and Archaeologists finds ancient fonts and when cross referenced those fonts are matching to what they were using at that time when King Asoka was ruling.. and also considering many other evidence it is conclusive that King Asoka indeed send his son to Sri Lanka and thus it becomes a fact!!!That's how history is made... myth is made rather easily.. as for RAMAYANA story there's no support evidence nor cross references! Its an isolated story in the history which has no connection to the history of what we know... more like GREEK MYTHOLOGY!!As for the Da Vinci's sketches... there's difference between somebody drawing and making it a reality!! People were dreaming about flying from anciant times they even painted them at that time... but no one really made it practical!! Again there's no evidence that flying machine was invented before 1903.. that's a FACT!So Da Vinci's drawings were only drawings.. A man with a vision.. that's it!! Chinese helicopter was only a bamboo stick which was a bit longer than a Popsicle stick.. they were toys NOT serious human carriers!!Then how do you say it existed? Look at it this way... if it ever existed.... even though one is unable to see the actual source.... there should be consequences because of it... every action has a reaction.. either the action or reaction is everlasting!!Bridge here refers to as "connect"..... besides NASA cannot declare its a man made Bridge or not.... NASA is a space program NOT a archaeological institution, besides as your sources claim this is 1,750,000 years ago... so you decide, at 1,750,000 years ago was Sri Lanka and India were as the same geological shape.. like it is today?NASA only provided the image the rest is as usual people's imagination!I'm being open! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/wink.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" /> Here both of us basically talking the same thing! only thing is you misunderstood the word "PHYSICS"!I said "PHYSICS" as in general.. I'm giving my full respect to my people, that's why I said ancient Sinhalese had good Physics knowledge, I don't like to call them mysteries.. I'd like to call them solid work of arts based on solid science they knew what they were doing.... mysteries are things you say exist put can't prove it does!!</blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom