Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 8047636" data-attributes="member: 262433">If you are interested I'm gonna continue this conversation from a theistic view.The example is to explain a point. Does not mean that two entities involved in should have the same attributes. Example: We can say that the shape of Jupiter is closer to the shape of a cricket ball. Here we are not trying to compare Jupiter to the ball, but we compare the shape of the two objects.One cannot assume that a certain task is carried out for a specific reason. All the views are subjective and a person will come to a conclusion based on what he observe and experience in life. You can safely state that the tests you faced in life were carried out to test your knowledge, ability or because your teacher is not sure of what you have learned. This is logical to you since that is what you have experienced. But it does not mean that every test in the world is carried out for that same reasons. If you assume the allmighty GOD, then you must agree that an omniscience GOD will have logic beyond our comprehension. If there is a test, assuming reasons for it based on your view is not logical.</blockquote>

Top Bottom