Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="shiran24" data-source="post: 3909884" data-attributes="member: 161365">why the army kill terrorists? it is bcos; if we did not killed them then the terrorists will kill us. in this case, killing is not done as a punishment for terrorist activities but it is done for the safety of millions of people. as someone has said, killing is the last option. to make it clear, when terrorists surrender to army forces, they are not killed but punished according to civil law or rehabilitated or both.though the supporters of terrorism are worse than terrorists, we don't need to kill them. though they are supporting terrorism, they are civillians a long as they are not involved directly or indirectly in criminal activities. they can be punished according to civil law for supporting terrorism. no need to kill. but nothing to hide. i again say, they are the worst not terrorists. (civil law must be developed so that these supporters of terrorism can be taken in front of law.)however, you (atula) know to express what you want to tell in subtle ways. mind this. the supporters of war are not equal with the supporters of terrorism. if we did not support war, we will lost more lives by terrorists. but the objective of the supporters of terrorism is not that. they are not supporting terrorism to save million lives but to seperate the country and lead to a ceaseless war between two countries that will cause millions of killings.</blockquote>

Top Bottom