Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mal Aiyya" data-source="post: 4452331" data-attributes="member: 81650">Ok, so lets use our neighbour's example again. Did India go land-hunting?Yes the British gained all that throgh their invasions, but didnt they implement all that in SL also? maybe not for the well-being of SL itelf, but hasnt SL benefitted vastly out of that? So technically, the invasions of the British aided the development of SL, during the British reign atleast.I didnt say UK was corruption-free at the first place, but the extent is not so vast as in SL. Thats where they gain their points.   How many times do I have to keep saying you, that this war, was NOT brought in by the colonizations? It is NOT. Read through my previous replies again, and you'll see why. Now dont pop up with this bulshit point again, unless you got another point against what I say. ( now this is like giving you the permit to utter your crap)    Why not quality? If you do infrastructure and development which is not sustainable, what kind of idiosm is that? The sri-lion idiosm? Your real life example meant nothig, and had so many loopholes, read my previos replies, I replied as to why it is not applicable. And if you are to buy quality, you need the capital, now where is SL going to find that?            Option 1:  Ask Sri lion, maybe out of his pocket money perhapsOption 2 : Grow it, just like how self sufficient we are!!    I agree that the natural environment has made it the best Tea, but if you dont have the entrepreneurshi, how on earth will an industry run? Do you think tea bags can grow on its own, and end up in shelves of stores? My point was that the British would provide better entrepreneurship to build the industry better. Even though you can find knowledge easily, you cant find the natural resources that easily, but the problem is, SL doesnt   Again, here we go. Dude, this was wasnt a by-product of the colonization though it looks so.And how the government manages to keep things cheap like this while encountering lossses like this is because of its donations, where do you think that comes from? Now dont say the British arent the biggest donors blah blah, I have said why this is affective in my previous reply.    Economically, yes India is performing better than SL. But talking about the Human development, yes India is lagging, but how does SL break this gap? The bloody begging crooks go beg more man! And India's policies are such that it boosts the morale of poeple to work, why this problem is great in India is becuase of the population. Its like the Natural selection process, the weaker ones are droped out with time leaving only the stronger ones which in the longer run, strengthens the country both economically and socially..Infact I have done research well enough to base my arguements.</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom