Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="HRA" data-source="post: 5543301" data-attributes="member: 6136">yesI already mentioned about the IDA and Shop oand office act.if our legislature can amend the IDA to include some mechanisms which are not in the act right now to prevent industrial disputes,mechanisms such as code of conducts,grievance handling procedures which are already use in some companies.it is also important that the right to strike should also be regulated through these Codes of Conduct in a manner that would prevent sudden work stoppages without any notice to employers.machan like this One major problem regarding the GRATUITY ACT that the industry faces in the plantations is with regard to resident employees enjoying all benefits granted by the Plantation Companies not reporting to work and continuing to remain in employment and adding years of service to their employment record.8 The total population of 434 Regional Plantation Company estates in 2006 was 934,000. Out of this, only 249,000 are employed, which amounts to 27% of the population.However, a large proportion of workers who are employed and whose names are in the checkroll report to work only as little as 5 – 10 days a month. For the payment of gratuity on reaching retirement age, these workers are also paidgratuity regardless of their irregularity at work over the years. The ultimate payout by way of gratuity to workers is massive. More importantly, Companies need to make provision for gratuity each year in their financial accounts and this creates a huge financial impact on the Companies. In order to prevent this problem we need to introduce an amendment to the Gratuity Act in respect of the definition of an“year” which is currently defined as a completed period of 12 months in terms of section 20. In other words, if an employee is retained in employment without a cessation of employment, irrespective of whether he reports to work or not, his absence is authorized or not, provision for gratuity has to be madeon the basis that there is continuous employment.therefore this provision should be amend as "“A “year” shall mean a completed period of 12 consecutive months during which a workman has worked not less than 180 days"like this machan every law has to be changed machan. above are some instances.</blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom