Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Yesterday at 2:11 PM
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Sunday at 3:05 AM
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Jun 11, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Education
Linux(SUSE 10.2) beats VISTA
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTRZ" data-source="post: 382838" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>hehe yeah you can't expect the world to be like that so its pointless. </p><p>Anyway i never said open source concept should wiped out. what i mean it there should be a balance and all the software can't be open source. </p><p>Just as an example i am running some well known software in this server which is the most expensive in it's class. Its a big paid software but its source is open so i can manage it. But there are limitations for what i can manage from the TOS. They find it nothing secret so they show the source but have limitations on their TOS. In other hand there are encoded software which using zend engine so they wanna keep their secrets. Their hard work and research they don't wanna pass it to the competitors. So in my openion developer should have the right to make it open or close. And the buyers can deside they wanna buy it or not.</p><p></p><p>About the cash flowing concept i think giving the main software free and asking for the payment for the services like giving a carrot with strings attached. To be real i think developing the main software is the biggest and the hardest part so talking it for real, no marketing tricks we give it for the cost involved. Then we give services for free or for a managed cost. If we give the main software free then we have to sell the services in really high price to cover the full cost which is not ethical and fair. Its like a marketing trick to give something free and attract them. </p><p></p><p></p><p> Other thing when the software is free and open source then others can give the service to a reduced price. So you can't guarantee you will make profits coz others will get profit from your main engine which you spent years to build.</p><p></p><p>In my opinion there should be all open source, closed source, free and paid software. Depending their application and cost involved we should choose the correct method to deliver it in an ethical and progressive way. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTRZ, post: 382838, member: 1"] hehe yeah you can't expect the world to be like that so its pointless. Anyway i never said open source concept should wiped out. what i mean it there should be a balance and all the software can't be open source. Just as an example i am running some well known software in this server which is the most expensive in it's class. Its a big paid software but its source is open so i can manage it. But there are limitations for what i can manage from the TOS. They find it nothing secret so they show the source but have limitations on their TOS. In other hand there are encoded software which using zend engine so they wanna keep their secrets. Their hard work and research they don't wanna pass it to the competitors. So in my openion developer should have the right to make it open or close. And the buyers can deside they wanna buy it or not. About the cash flowing concept i think giving the main software free and asking for the payment for the services like giving a carrot with strings attached. To be real i think developing the main software is the biggest and the hardest part so talking it for real, no marketing tricks we give it for the cost involved. Then we give services for free or for a managed cost. If we give the main software free then we have to sell the services in really high price to cover the full cost which is not ethical and fair. Its like a marketing trick to give something free and attract them. Other thing when the software is free and open source then others can give the service to a reduced price. So you can't guarantee you will make profits coz others will get profit from your main engine which you spent years to build. In my opinion there should be all open source, closed source, free and paid software. Depending their application and cost involved we should choose the correct method to deliver it in an ethical and progressive way. :yes: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom