Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Yesterday at 10:32 PM
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Yesterday at 3:55 PM
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Thursday at 2:23 PM
Ad icon
Wechat qr verification
Pawan2005
Updated:
Thursday at 1:28 AM
🚀 GOOGLE AI PRO 18 MONTHS ACTIVATION 🚀
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 5:34 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
ElaKiri.com
News and Updates
LTTE ekta kade yane eun!!!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wal Bada" data-source="post: 64815" data-attributes="member: 654"><p>My dear friend, prove that Dravidians were here before Sinhalese with materialistic evidence!!</p><p></p><p>You may have heard of Prof Neelakantha Shasthri, greatest of the Tamil historians. He also accepts that Mahavansa to be true. Mahavansa is true not because it is said to be true. cross references to chinese, indian, greek and roman literature just show silmilar records. Raavanaa story is a unproven folk story. Some think that Lankaapura of Raavanaa was a part of India and not SL!</p><p></p><p>Raavanaa was not a Hindu king. Hinduism started only about 1500 years ago in the Kushna era of India. Vedhas may be 5000 years old. But what parts of vedhas teach is to kill animals for offerings. How it is connected to Hindism which prohibits killing than any other religion? these 5000 year old system is not Hinduism, but called Upanishad and Vaidika religions. </p><p></p><p>And mahavansa is not the only evidence. Throughout the North East area there are ruins of buddhist shrines, but very little hindu shrines. No hindu shrines are found more than 1000 years old. Even the names of north was changed by tamil surveyers when they were making maps under British. </p><p>Ex-</p><p>Hunugama-Chunnakam</p><p>Thambalagamuwa - Thampalakamama</p><p>Gokanna - Trincomalee</p><p>Ganthalaya - Kanthei</p><p>Digamadulla - Amparai</p><p>Malwathu Oya - Aruvi Aru</p><p>Mahwil Oya - Mavil Aru</p><p>Thiriyaya - Thiriyayi</p><p>Naagadeepa - Nainativu</p><p>Dambakolapatuna - Kankasanthurai</p><p></p><p>Then little bit on the medical side. The Tamils in SL are descending fro Sinhalese!!!!!!! mutations of thalassemia gene which is responsible for blood disorder called thalassemia is unique to races. Mutations of Sinhalese differ from that of South Indians. It is similar to that of Bengalis. SL Tamils' mutations are more similar to Sinhalese than South Indians, hence proving that most of Tamils in SL (barring in the hills) are descending from Sinhalese</p><p></p><p>My dear Mayuresan, tou have been very ignorant and has digested what Tamil nationalists have been teacing you without analysing that. Plese be little careful in presenting these kinds of facts as you will look foolish when somebody challenges you with evidence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wal Bada, post: 64815, member: 654"] My dear friend, prove that Dravidians were here before Sinhalese with materialistic evidence!! You may have heard of Prof Neelakantha Shasthri, greatest of the Tamil historians. He also accepts that Mahavansa to be true. Mahavansa is true not because it is said to be true. cross references to chinese, indian, greek and roman literature just show silmilar records. Raavanaa story is a unproven folk story. Some think that Lankaapura of Raavanaa was a part of India and not SL! Raavanaa was not a Hindu king. Hinduism started only about 1500 years ago in the Kushna era of India. Vedhas may be 5000 years old. But what parts of vedhas teach is to kill animals for offerings. How it is connected to Hindism which prohibits killing than any other religion? these 5000 year old system is not Hinduism, but called Upanishad and Vaidika religions. And mahavansa is not the only evidence. Throughout the North East area there are ruins of buddhist shrines, but very little hindu shrines. No hindu shrines are found more than 1000 years old. Even the names of north was changed by tamil surveyers when they were making maps under British. Ex- Hunugama-Chunnakam Thambalagamuwa - Thampalakamama Gokanna - Trincomalee Ganthalaya - Kanthei Digamadulla - Amparai Malwathu Oya - Aruvi Aru Mahwil Oya - Mavil Aru Thiriyaya - Thiriyayi Naagadeepa - Nainativu Dambakolapatuna - Kankasanthurai Then little bit on the medical side. The Tamils in SL are descending fro Sinhalese!!!!!!! mutations of thalassemia gene which is responsible for blood disorder called thalassemia is unique to races. Mutations of Sinhalese differ from that of South Indians. It is similar to that of Bengalis. SL Tamils' mutations are more similar to Sinhalese than South Indians, hence proving that most of Tamils in SL (barring in the hills) are descending from Sinhalese My dear Mayuresan, tou have been very ignorant and has digested what Tamil nationalists have been teacing you without analysing that. Plese be little careful in presenting these kinds of facts as you will look foolish when somebody challenges you with evidence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Asuwa dahayen wadi kalama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom