Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Thursday at 2:23 PM
Ad icon
Wechat qr verification
Pawan2005
Updated:
Thursday at 1:28 AM
🚀 GOOGLE AI PRO 18 MONTHS ACTIVATION 🚀
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 5:34 PM
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
vgp
Updated:
Jun 5, 2026
එක පැකේජ් එකයි මාසෙටම Unlimited Internet. තාමත් DATA CARD දාන්න සල්ලි වියදම් කරනවද? අඩුම මිලට අපෙන්.
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Jun 2, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Mangala's anti-war program
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rapa" data-source="post: 289043" data-attributes="member: 212"><p>Spat over military strategy caused Govt. crisis - Officials</p><p>*MR forwarded comprehensive dossier on LTTE line of attack to New Delhi</p><p>by Shamindra Ferdinando</p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.island.lk/2007/02/15/p1-4.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>Speculation in political and defence circles is that sharp differences between the ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs over the government’s military strategy led to the recent stripping of Mangala Samaraweera of the foreign ministry portfolio.</p><p>Samaraweera also lost ports, aviation and shipping portfolios. An authoritative official revealed that serious differences had repeatedly surfaced at the National Security Council with the foreign ministry strongly disputing the strategy articulated by Defence Secretary Colonel (retd) Gotabhaya Rajapakse.</p><p>Speaking on the condition of anonymity, the official said that the foreign ministry repeatedly called for restraint on the part of the government even at the expense of national security.</p><p>The foreign ministry had wanted the defence ministry to compromise on several touchy issues including the deployment of SLAF choppers to facilitate movements of LTTE leaders.</p><p>They had also clashed over the closure of the Muhamalai gateway to the Jaffna Peninsula after the abortive LTTE attempt to overrun the army’s Jaffna frontline last August.</p><p>They had also differed on the handling of international NGOs.</p><p>Foreign ministry mandarins had claimed that the defence ministry’s actions would antagonise the international community.</p><p>Their differences had widened after President Mahinda Rajapakse authorised major ground operations in response to the growing LTTE threat, well informed sources said. Samaraweera had sided with his officials, the sources said.</p><p>The defence ministry had reacted angrily to the criticism over the disappearances of Tamil youth. The defence ministry had accused Samaraweera of endorsing the LTTE inspired accusations and criticism over disappearances and what a section of the media termed as gross human rights violations. The sources claimed that the foreign ministry gave in to the LTTE. "Suddenly we were under fire by the foreign ministry," the official said.</p><p>In fact, the President had been late in dealing with the situation, the sources said. Non-Cabinet ranker Sripathy Sooriyarachchi had sided with Samaraweera due to their close relationship, the sources said. The sources acknowledged that Sooriyarachchi had been vociferous supporter of the military action aimed at defeating the LTTE.</p><p>Like Samaraweera, Sooriyarachchi had played a critical role in facilitating Mahinda Rajapakse’s victory in the Gampaha district, at the last presidential election, in the absence of the District Leader Anura Bandaranaike who skipped the campaign.</p><p>The sources severely criticised the JVP’s decision to back Samaraweera. The sources accused the JVP of turning a blind eye to the ongoing efforts to destroy the LTTE. While calling for the termination of the CFA and all out war against the LTTE, the JVP was taking the side of Samaraweera, who stands for a Federal solution.</p><p>The President had authorised military action in response to the LTTE’s military challenge. The Island learns that Rajapakse had briefed the Indian leadership of the impending LTTE threat. The President, during his first visit to New Delhi, after assuming the presidency, had presented a dossier on the LTTE to the Indian leadership. A copy of it had been also presented to the Pakistan government. Authoritative sources said that the government made a candid assessment of the ground situation and recommended urgent steps to neutralize the threat. According to the report, if the LTTE was given a free hand it would have posed a serious threat to national security. The report had warned of a devastating strike on the Jaffna Peninsula while acknowledging that security forces would not have been in a position to thwart the offensive. The report had been with the Indians months before the LTTE made an abortive bid to cripple the strategic Trincomalee harbour in the first week of August and then struck across the Jaffna frontline from Kilaly extending up to Nagarkovil on the Vadamaratchchy East coast. The dossier also predicted that the LTTE would mount amphibious assault across the Jaffna lagoon to facilitate the ground offensive spearheaded by artillery units. "To our credit we envisaged almost the entire LTTE strategy long before the actual offensive got underway," a senior official said. According to him, the LTTE seized Mavilaru to force the government’s hand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rapa, post: 289043, member: 212"] Spat over military strategy caused Govt. crisis - Officials *MR forwarded comprehensive dossier on LTTE line of attack to New Delhi by Shamindra Ferdinando [IMG]http://www.island.lk/2007/02/15/p1-4.jpg[/IMG] Speculation in political and defence circles is that sharp differences between the ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs over the government’s military strategy led to the recent stripping of Mangala Samaraweera of the foreign ministry portfolio. Samaraweera also lost ports, aviation and shipping portfolios. An authoritative official revealed that serious differences had repeatedly surfaced at the National Security Council with the foreign ministry strongly disputing the strategy articulated by Defence Secretary Colonel (retd) Gotabhaya Rajapakse. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, the official said that the foreign ministry repeatedly called for restraint on the part of the government even at the expense of national security. The foreign ministry had wanted the defence ministry to compromise on several touchy issues including the deployment of SLAF choppers to facilitate movements of LTTE leaders. They had also clashed over the closure of the Muhamalai gateway to the Jaffna Peninsula after the abortive LTTE attempt to overrun the army’s Jaffna frontline last August. They had also differed on the handling of international NGOs. Foreign ministry mandarins had claimed that the defence ministry’s actions would antagonise the international community. Their differences had widened after President Mahinda Rajapakse authorised major ground operations in response to the growing LTTE threat, well informed sources said. Samaraweera had sided with his officials, the sources said. The defence ministry had reacted angrily to the criticism over the disappearances of Tamil youth. The defence ministry had accused Samaraweera of endorsing the LTTE inspired accusations and criticism over disappearances and what a section of the media termed as gross human rights violations. The sources claimed that the foreign ministry gave in to the LTTE. "Suddenly we were under fire by the foreign ministry," the official said. In fact, the President had been late in dealing with the situation, the sources said. Non-Cabinet ranker Sripathy Sooriyarachchi had sided with Samaraweera due to their close relationship, the sources said. The sources acknowledged that Sooriyarachchi had been vociferous supporter of the military action aimed at defeating the LTTE. Like Samaraweera, Sooriyarachchi had played a critical role in facilitating Mahinda Rajapakse’s victory in the Gampaha district, at the last presidential election, in the absence of the District Leader Anura Bandaranaike who skipped the campaign. The sources severely criticised the JVP’s decision to back Samaraweera. The sources accused the JVP of turning a blind eye to the ongoing efforts to destroy the LTTE. While calling for the termination of the CFA and all out war against the LTTE, the JVP was taking the side of Samaraweera, who stands for a Federal solution. The President had authorised military action in response to the LTTE’s military challenge. The Island learns that Rajapakse had briefed the Indian leadership of the impending LTTE threat. The President, during his first visit to New Delhi, after assuming the presidency, had presented a dossier on the LTTE to the Indian leadership. A copy of it had been also presented to the Pakistan government. Authoritative sources said that the government made a candid assessment of the ground situation and recommended urgent steps to neutralize the threat. According to the report, if the LTTE was given a free hand it would have posed a serious threat to national security. The report had warned of a devastating strike on the Jaffna Peninsula while acknowledging that security forces would not have been in a position to thwart the offensive. The report had been with the Indians months before the LTTE made an abortive bid to cripple the strategic Trincomalee harbour in the first week of August and then struck across the Jaffna frontline from Kilaly extending up to Nagarkovil on the Vadamaratchchy East coast. The dossier also predicted that the LTTE would mount amphibious assault across the Jaffna lagoon to facilitate the ground offensive spearheaded by artillery units. "To our credit we envisaged almost the entire LTTE strategy long before the actual offensive got underway," a senior official said. According to him, the LTTE seized Mavilaru to force the government’s hand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Awruddata maasa keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom