Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Iptv
musicking
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:52 AM
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Jul 19, 2026
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Sports
Murali - faulty to Gilchrist, OK to Warne
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3748755" data-source="post: 3339443" data-attributes="member: 99744"><p>It is interesting that just a few days before the former Australian wicket keeper Adam Gilchrist said that he believed Muttiah Muralitharan throws the ball, Gilchrist’s former team mate, the spin bowling legend Shane Warne picked Murali in the seventh place among the 100 best cricketers to have played the game during his career.</p><p></p><p>There would be little doubt in anyone’s mind about Warne’s ability to judge Murali’s skill, while Gilchrist doubts what technology has proved – that Murali’s action is clean according to laws of the game.</p><p>It is worthwhile to consider ICC’s experiment currently going on about using TV replays and computer analysis to judge certain dismissals including lbw’s. The use of technology is aimed at minimising human error, part of which is optical illusions. </p><p></p><p>Gilchrist’s doubting of technology is no more than his eagerness to doubt Murali’s action which has not been doubted officially in any forum in recent times, other than by certain individuals searching either to earn an extra buck or seek cheap publicity.</p><p></p><p>Following are some excerpts from what Warne has written in his latest books titled “Shane Warne’s century” about Murali.</p><p></p><p>“However many wickets Murali has at the end of his Test Career, the figure may never be beaten. People thought I was mad when I first said that he could push all the way to the 1000 mark. Maybe that will prove to be an overestimation, but not by much. </p><p></p><p>Although injuries are starting to take their toll, with medical science being what it is, and Sri Lanka’s determination to keep him going for as long as possible, he could still make that magic number and sit there for ever at the top of the list. I say this because Murali has been unique – nothing about other bowlers prepares you for the challenge.”</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=31584" target="_blank">-DM-</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3748755, post: 3339443, member: 99744"] It is interesting that just a few days before the former Australian wicket keeper Adam Gilchrist said that he believed Muttiah Muralitharan throws the ball, Gilchrist’s former team mate, the spin bowling legend Shane Warne picked Murali in the seventh place among the 100 best cricketers to have played the game during his career. There would be little doubt in anyone’s mind about Warne’s ability to judge Murali’s skill, while Gilchrist doubts what technology has proved – that Murali’s action is clean according to laws of the game. It is worthwhile to consider ICC’s experiment currently going on about using TV replays and computer analysis to judge certain dismissals including lbw’s. The use of technology is aimed at minimising human error, part of which is optical illusions. Gilchrist’s doubting of technology is no more than his eagerness to doubt Murali’s action which has not been doubted officially in any forum in recent times, other than by certain individuals searching either to earn an extra buck or seek cheap publicity. Following are some excerpts from what Warne has written in his latest books titled “Shane Warne’s century” about Murali. “However many wickets Murali has at the end of his Test Career, the figure may never be beaten. People thought I was mad when I first said that he could push all the way to the 1000 mark. Maybe that will prove to be an overestimation, but not by much. Although injuries are starting to take their toll, with medical science being what it is, and Sri Lanka’s determination to keep him going for as long as possible, he could still make that magic number and sit there for ever at the top of the list. I say this because Murali has been unique – nothing about other bowlers prepares you for the challenge.” [URL="http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=31584"]-DM-[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom