Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Sports
Muralitharan is better than Warne: Sobers
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gamenamababy" data-source="post: 385070" data-attributes="member: 13730"><p>Shane Warne or Muthiah Muralitharan; who is better? Perhaps this is one of the most contentious comparisons in world cricket, maybe even more intriguing than the Lara-Tendulkar comparison. </p><p></p><p>Both Warne and Muralitharan have 1000 international wickets and both of them are feared by batsmen around the world. Is the mastery of Shane Warne better or the lethal rippers of Muthiah Muralitharan? </p><p></p><p>For cricketing legend Sir Garfield Sobers, Muralitharan is a better player and according to him for batsmen, Muralitharan is a difficult bowler to face. </p><p></p><p>"I think Muralitharan is more difficult because he develops something that no other off-spinner has ever developed. And he bowls it well. Shane Warne bowls a leg break that turns big a googly that you can go to sleep and wake up and see it. He (Warne) doesn't have the same kind of difficulty like Murali in destroying a batsman. If you put two new batsmen who have never seen either of the two into bat, Muralitharan will give them more trouble than Share Warne would," argues Sobers. </p><p></p><p>But despite his achievements, Muralitharan has always remained tainted. There have been serious suspicions over his action even after the clearance by the International Cricket Council (ICC). However, Sobers rubbishes all such claims and supports Muralitharan's actions with good reasoning. </p><p></p><p>"As far as what I see, it is very difficult to be able to track a ball with off break action that turns some leg to off, very difficult, you can't chuck that. Because it comes over the top, you can't chuck. You've got to bowl it. Muralitharan's hand is never straight and that is one of the things. He starts very close to his chest. </p><p></p><p>He doesn't start like a normal bowler with arms up there where it is stretched out already. You don't chuck with your wrist, but you chuck with your elbow. And the definition of chuck, if the world has forgotten, is the straightening of elbow at the point of delivery and his (Muralitharan's) elbow does not straighten at the point of delivery," Sobers substantiates his belief that the Sri Lankan is not a chucker. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps, strong words of support for Muralitharan from someone who many believe was easily one of the greatest batsmen, ahead of ICC cricket World Cup in West Indies in March 2007.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gamenamababy, post: 385070, member: 13730"] Shane Warne or Muthiah Muralitharan; who is better? Perhaps this is one of the most contentious comparisons in world cricket, maybe even more intriguing than the Lara-Tendulkar comparison. Both Warne and Muralitharan have 1000 international wickets and both of them are feared by batsmen around the world. Is the mastery of Shane Warne better or the lethal rippers of Muthiah Muralitharan? For cricketing legend Sir Garfield Sobers, Muralitharan is a better player and according to him for batsmen, Muralitharan is a difficult bowler to face. "I think Muralitharan is more difficult because he develops something that no other off-spinner has ever developed. And he bowls it well. Shane Warne bowls a leg break that turns big a googly that you can go to sleep and wake up and see it. He (Warne) doesn't have the same kind of difficulty like Murali in destroying a batsman. If you put two new batsmen who have never seen either of the two into bat, Muralitharan will give them more trouble than Share Warne would," argues Sobers. But despite his achievements, Muralitharan has always remained tainted. There have been serious suspicions over his action even after the clearance by the International Cricket Council (ICC). However, Sobers rubbishes all such claims and supports Muralitharan's actions with good reasoning. "As far as what I see, it is very difficult to be able to track a ball with off break action that turns some leg to off, very difficult, you can't chuck that. Because it comes over the top, you can't chuck. You've got to bowl it. Muralitharan's hand is never straight and that is one of the things. He starts very close to his chest. He doesn't start like a normal bowler with arms up there where it is stretched out already. You don't chuck with your wrist, but you chuck with your elbow. And the definition of chuck, if the world has forgotten, is the straightening of elbow at the point of delivery and his (Muralitharan's) elbow does not straighten at the point of delivery," Sobers substantiates his belief that the Sri Lankan is not a chucker. Perhaps, strong words of support for Muralitharan from someone who many believe was easily one of the greatest batsmen, ahead of ICC cricket World Cup in West Indies in March 2007. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)
Post reply
Top
Bottom