Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Chethiya Wijayawardhana" data-source="post: 29361476" data-attributes="member: 556545">[MEDIA=youtube]Bbzw5Ym8ies[/MEDIA]<img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🦷" title="Tooth    :tooth:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f9b7.png" data-shortname=":tooth:" /> Evolutionary Enigma<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Humans possess a unique feature, the chin, absent in other species.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Scientists historically applied adaptationism, assuming every trait has a clear function due to natural selection.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The concept of adaptationism faced challenges in the 60s and 70s, especially with the introduction of Moto Kimura's neutral theory of molecular evolution.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🧬" title="Dna    :dna:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f9ec.png" data-shortname=":dna:" /> The Power of Genetic Drift<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Kimura's neutral theory suggests that most genetic variations result from genetic drift, not natural selection.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Genetic drift is illustrated through simulations, showcasing random chance's role in evolutionary changes.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The theory highlights that a significant portion of the genome is non-functional, making mutations in these areas largely unaffected by natural selection.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🧬" title="Dna    :dna:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f9ec.png" data-shortname=":dna:" /> Mutational Odds and Genetic Drift<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Neutral mutations, occurring in non-functional parts of the genome, are predominant, driven by genetic drift.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Deleterious mutations in functional parts are eliminated by natural selection.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Truly advantageous mutations are rare, emphasizing the substantial role of neutral mutations in genome evolution.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🌍" title="Globe showing Europe-Africa    :earth_africa:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f30d.png" data-shortname=":earth_africa:" /> Gould and Lewontin's Challenge<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gould and Lewontin's "Spandrels of San Marco" paper questions the adaptationist paradigm.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They challenge the assumption that every trait is an adaptation, introducing the concept of spandrels.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The analogy to Leibniz's "best of all possible worlds" underscores the danger of blindly applying adaptationist thinking.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🌀" title="Cyclone    :cyclone:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f300.png" data-shortname=":cyclone:" /> Challenging Panglossian Paradigm<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Panglossian paradigm assumes every trait is an adaptation optimized for a purpose.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gould and Lewontin caution against adaptive storytelling, urging consideration of non-adaptive possibilities.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Evolutionary history, as revealed by phylogenetics, helps avoid oversimplified adaptive narratives.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🐼" title="Panda    :panda_face:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f43c.png" data-shortname=":panda_face:" /> Evolutionary Spandrels: Panda's Thumb<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Panda's thumb enlargement is proposed as a spandrel, not necessarily an adaptation.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gold highlights instances where traits may be byproducts of genetic constraints, like the panda's thumb and hand enlargement.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Biological spandrels are observed in various organisms, challenging traditional adaptation-focused viewpoints.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤔" title="Thinking face    :thinking:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f914.png" data-shortname=":thinking:" /> Aftermath of Spandrels<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The spandrels paper created controversy, leading to adaptation becoming a contentious term in the early 80s.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Luanton introduces niche construction, emphasizing organisms shaping their environments.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The extended evolutionary synthesis promotes a broader perspective, acknowledging multiple factors in evolutionary processes.</li> </ul><img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🔄" title="Counterclockwise arrows button    :arrows_counterclockwise:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/6.6/png/unicode/64/1f504.png" data-shortname=":arrows_counterclockwise:" /> Beyond Adaptationism<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Luanton's niche construction challenges the lock-and-key analogy, portraying organisms and environments as interdependent.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The extended evolutionary synthesis seeks a comprehensive understanding beyond the adaptationist framework.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Organisms are viewed as active participants influencing their evolutionary paths, fostering a more holistic approach to biology.</li> </ul></blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom