Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OptiplexFx" data-source="post: 4923448" data-attributes="member: 208281">A cut down version of 5800 XM <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No 3G</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No GPS</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No Front camera</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Slightly smaller screen (2.9" vs 3.2")</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Slightly less internal memory (70MB vs 80MB)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">No info on the processor, but I guess its the same</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Less battery life (4h 45min Talk time vs 8h 45min)</li> </ul>I guess Nokia want to expand their touch screen market and reach more people by offering a budget phone, because there are plenty of touch screen offerings out there from other manufacturers which are cheaper than 5800 XM.Tikak chaa thamai... C'mon NO 3G or GPS ?? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/growl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":growl:" title="Growl    :growl:" data-shortname=":growl:" />But looks a lot nicer than 5800 XM <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/sad.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":(" title="Sad    :(" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

Top Bottom