Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
RHCSA, RHCE, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes Training
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:28 AM
🛡️ Kaspersky Antivirus – 1 Year / 1 Device | Rs. 2,300 | Only 9 Left
KSPathirana
Updated:
Sep 7, 2026
Ad icon
Professional CCTV Installation Service
Techguy231
Updated:
Sep 6, 2026
Ad icon
I'll research & write an article - Rs. 2000 onwards
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Sep 3, 2026
House Plan
lenura
Updated:
Sep 2, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Obata Aithiyak nadda???
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nash_Node" data-source="post: 2140147" data-attributes="member: 91200"><p><strong>Situation 1 </strong>Neethimaya Pattha - <strong>NO, </strong>a government employee DOES not have the legle right to discuss the affairs of the Government<strong> <u>OPPOSING IT</u></strong>. It will be accounted as Treason againt the government and will be punishable in way of interdicting his job.</p><p></p><p><strong>Situation 2 </strong>Neethimaya Pattha - <strong>YES, </strong><u>ONLY and IF ONLY </u> the employee has suffered personal losses or mental disconfort because of the job portfolio (which was NOT WHAT HE AGREED when taking over the job)</p><p></p><p>Please note that the <strong>Situation 2</strong> ONLY applicable to a SINGLE EMPLOYEE</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sadacharathmaka Peththa - <strong>NO again. </strong>every Government employee has a code of conduct minted and approved by the Parliment, Authorized by the Supreme Court of Justice. The employee cannot conduct him self in anyway contradicting to the said Code-of-Conduct.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Prayogika Peththa - <strong>YES, </strong>That's what the strikes, work to the rule campaigns are all about <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's a vast subject on how each of these covers the other, and each of such tries to screw the other. But that's the basic outline of things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nash_Node, post: 2140147, member: 91200"] [B]Situation 1 [/B]Neethimaya Pattha - [B]NO, [/B]a government employee DOES not have the legle right to discuss the affairs of the Government[B] [U]OPPOSING IT[/U][/B]. It will be accounted as Treason againt the government and will be punishable in way of interdicting his job. [B]Situation 2 [/B]Neethimaya Pattha - [B]YES, [/B][U]ONLY and IF ONLY [/U] the employee has suffered personal losses or mental disconfort because of the job portfolio (which was NOT WHAT HE AGREED when taking over the job) Please note that the [B]Situation 2[/B] ONLY applicable to a SINGLE EMPLOYEE Sadacharathmaka Peththa - [B]NO again. [/B]every Government employee has a code of conduct minted and approved by the Parliment, Authorized by the Supreme Court of Justice. The employee cannot conduct him self in anyway contradicting to the said Code-of-Conduct. Prayogika Peththa - [B]YES, [/B]That's what the strikes, work to the rule campaigns are all about :rolleyes: It's a vast subject on how each of these covers the other, and each of such tries to screw the other. But that's the basic outline of things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom