Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet
Romeshka
Updated:
Yesterday at 12:16 AM
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Jul 2, 2026
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Jul 1, 2026
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
News
Pepsi fined over condom in bottle
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hellbuster" data-source="post: 8403" data-attributes="member: 10"><p><strong>Soft drinks manufacturer Pepsi has been ordered to pay 20,000 rupees ($445) in damages to a man from Delhi who found a condom in a sealed bottle. </strong></p><p></p><p>The company, which was also ordered to pay 100,000 rupees ($2,225) to the Consumer Legal Aid Fund, said it planned to challenge the order. </p><p></p><p>The case was brought before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in the Indian capital by Sudesh Sharma. </p><p></p><p>Pepsi denied negligence and claimed the bottles were probably fake goods. </p><p></p><p>A company representative told the court the bottles may have contained a bogus product illegally marketed under its brand name. </p><p></p><p>Mr Sharma said he purchased two bottles of Pepsi from a shop in the Kashmere Gate area of the capital in 2003. </p><p></p><p>He said he suffered severe headaches and insomnia after consuming the drink from one of the bottles and had to seek medical treatment. </p><p></p><p>Mr Sharma said he found dirt in the empty bottle and when he looked inside the other bottle, which was still sealed, he found a condom. </p><p></p><p>The Press Trust of India reported the court as saying Pepsi had failed in its duty towards its customers by failing to take action against people passing off inferior products as Pepsi. </p><p></p><p><strong>'Lame excuse'</strong> </p><p></p><p>It rejected as a "lame excuse" Pepsi's objection that it was not liable because it did not have any authorised dealers in the Kashmere Gate area. </p><p></p><p>The court said the case was "rare" and had a serious bearing on public health. </p><p></p><p>It said: "This case is an eye-opener for others who are engaged in manufacturing soft-drinks and are required to maintain the prescribed standards of purity in public interest during the course of their business activities". </p><p></p><p>Pepsico India said the court order was "erroneous" and they said they would be taking steps to challenge it. </p><p></p><p>The soft drinks market in India is worth millions of dollars. </p><p></p><p>Coca-Cola and Pepsi account for more than 90% of the carbonated drinks market in India and together sell more than 500 million bottles every year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hellbuster, post: 8403, member: 10"] [B]Soft drinks manufacturer Pepsi has been ordered to pay 20,000 rupees ($445) in damages to a man from Delhi who found a condom in a sealed bottle. [/B] The company, which was also ordered to pay 100,000 rupees ($2,225) to the Consumer Legal Aid Fund, said it planned to challenge the order. The case was brought before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in the Indian capital by Sudesh Sharma. Pepsi denied negligence and claimed the bottles were probably fake goods. A company representative told the court the bottles may have contained a bogus product illegally marketed under its brand name. Mr Sharma said he purchased two bottles of Pepsi from a shop in the Kashmere Gate area of the capital in 2003. He said he suffered severe headaches and insomnia after consuming the drink from one of the bottles and had to seek medical treatment. Mr Sharma said he found dirt in the empty bottle and when he looked inside the other bottle, which was still sealed, he found a condom. The Press Trust of India reported the court as saying Pepsi had failed in its duty towards its customers by failing to take action against people passing off inferior products as Pepsi. [B]'Lame excuse'[/B] It rejected as a "lame excuse" Pepsi's objection that it was not liable because it did not have any authorised dealers in the Kashmere Gate area. The court said the case was "rare" and had a serious bearing on public health. It said: "This case is an eye-opener for others who are engaged in manufacturing soft-drinks and are required to maintain the prescribed standards of purity in public interest during the course of their business activities". Pepsico India said the court order was "erroneous" and they said they would be taking steps to challenge it. The soft drinks market in India is worth millions of dollars. Coca-Cola and Pepsi account for more than 90% of the carbonated drinks market in India and together sell more than 500 million bottles every year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom