Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="sampath_lanka" data-source="post: 9886960" data-attributes="member: 332916">Oh no my feelings are hurt... AAhh I cannot bare the pain.. any longer.. You got me there.. Deyyo Saakki... Jimma mala JimmooSo my question goes as follows:Why are there so many people/ users who use their first argumentative attack by attacking the gender like ponnaya etc. or any other ad hominem, passive aggressive ways to indirectly attack the opponent?Let us examine some answers:- They themselves know that that would hurt themselves, so they think that would be an effective weapon against the person they wish to smite down.- They are inherently dumbf---s who are inclined to use other means to win the argument via Ad Hominem.- Among the socially lowest class in Sri Lanka? So when the opponent speaks in Sinhalese they think of the opponent as equals and so imagine they can easily put the opponent down, were he to win the argument - in other words because of Jealousy.- They are ones with 2 digit IQs, attaching photos of famous and good looking actors because they themselves feel insecure and have low self esteem. They find it an escape from their emotions to attack the person making an argument and feel superior- They are in need of that?- They are ones who are bored and find it amusing to attack people and talk at random to trivial 'good for nothing' threads and discussons ( like me <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />) They are crazy, unserious and multifaceted in their personality they portray outside. Because of this they should also be treated with equal unseriousness (was that even a word?)</blockquote>

Verification: Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom