Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GihanFX" data-source="post: 5644952" data-attributes="member: 69972">Rather than dismissing democracy as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum" target="_blank">popular fallacy</a> or treating it with open contempt, Mencken's response to it was a publicized sense of amusement. His feelings on this subject (like his casual feelings on many other such subjects) are sprinkled throughout his writings over the years, very occasionally taking center-stage with the full force of Mencken's prose: "[D]emocracy gives [the beatification of mediocrity] a certain appearance of objective and demonstrable truth. The mob man, functioning as citizen, gets a feeling that he is really important to the world - that he is genuinely running things. Out of his maudlin herding after rogues and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountebanks" target="_blank">mountebanks</a> there comes to him a sense of vast and mysterious power—which is what makes archbishops, police sergeants, the grand goblins of the Ku Klux and other such magnificoes happy. And out of it there comes, too, a conviction that he is somehow wise, that his views are taken seriously by his betters - which is what makes United States Senators, fortune tellers and Young Intellectuals happy. Finally, there comes out of it a glowing consciousness of a high duty triumphantly done which is what makes hangmen and husbands happy." </blockquote>

Top Bottom