Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hyaenidae" data-source="post: 20378699" data-attributes="member: 530392">However you try to describe it you're still a liar. Negative reinforcement? Ha! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" />I know that's a budget car but you didn't buy it "on a budget", you spent more than 2,210,000 bucks. You bought a budget car for a ridiculous price tag which would suffice to buy an used Jap sedan. I respect your decision and you might had your reasons but I wouldn't advice any potential carbuyer to do what you did.Check the link I've posted on my previous reply. Yes maybe the 1.0L version might be fixed but what about people who already bought the 800CC version? Don't they deserve the same level of protection?Hetti countered the safety argument with this. Having an unstable body shell is obviously a fault. The company might have done it as a cost cutting measure and won't issue a recall but it's still a fault that could cause death of someone.I FREAKING DON'T WANT TO LECTURE YOU OR ANY KWID OWNER DAMMIT, EVERY POST I POST HERE IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE POTENTIAL  CARBUYER WHO IS INTERESTED IN BUYING THE KWID, HE/SHE SHOULD KNOW THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVES OUT THERE AND MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION. HOW MANY FREAKING TIMES I HAVE TO REPEAT THIS? Good.</blockquote>

Top Bottom