Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="madurax86" data-source="post: 6191400" data-attributes="member: 1293">they have redone mem management alot i can't say whether its at the same level cos i didnt benchmark the two. Windows actually has more problems to answer in memory exploits <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" /> they have redone the library loading architecture to the kernel and other windows programs that are the bases of virus attacks.for example they are not allowing custom code/dlls to be loaded on to the windows sound system directly they have a separate executable that handles *alien* code <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" /> they have improved since XP alot but can't say it matches Unix model cos Unix is older than Windows and Unix main executables were written mostly by universities ..same goes for Linus too this is his lil project nee <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /> so i think it is more solid, actually the solidity can be measured when the OS is challenged by new technologies, for instance Unicode at the early stages of Linux there wasn't a clue about 2 byte characters but it survived the transfer and is very successful -- ofcause unicode support in Linux is higher than that of Windows even 7 has problems with Unicode implementation--still!</blockquote>

Verification: Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)

Top Bottom