Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Google Pixel 9 Pro
vgp
Updated:
Yesterday at 5:57 PM
Ad icon
Jobreceive.com for sale
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Tuesday at 8:55 PM
Post Your Vehicle for Sale — FREE! - https://libro.lk
Kalu_Puth
Updated:
Tuesday at 7:38 PM
ඔයාගෙ Assignment හෝ Thesis එක හරියට හදාගමු
ErMurazor
Updated:
Saturday at 10:52 PM
Ad icon
BlackWall V2ray servers
hu KANNA
Updated:
Sep 23, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
SAITM අදාලම නැත
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PUKARIS" data-source="post: 21236278" data-attributes="member: 560784"><p>ok.. here is what I want to say. we are now getting this thing beyond our primary topic. What I am saying is this court decision entirely wrong and it was done according to their internal agenda. What you are saying is correct but only with facts. </p><p>If this judges wanted to give such a big decision they should allow GMOA to participate in this case. The court rejected the GMOA's reguest. It was a planned one. If the court did have a good intention then they should call for all the affected parties and the parties that will affect. you can say that judges acted according to the order of constitution. But If judges needed they could have found a pathway around it. </p><p></p><p>Whatever it is now they gave a decision. Don't try to say that the judges are innocent. I am not saying that the GMOA is right. GMOA have some sort of bad habit on intervening everything they can see. I am not saying that the everything done by the GMOA is correct but in this situation they should act. someone should act.</p><p></p><p>this is the most idiotic court judgement ever.. It doesn't matter that whether the judges acted according to constitution or not. They have made a decision that will affect badly on country's health sector.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PUKARIS, post: 21236278, member: 560784"] ok.. here is what I want to say. we are now getting this thing beyond our primary topic. What I am saying is this court decision entirely wrong and it was done according to their internal agenda. What you are saying is correct but only with facts. If this judges wanted to give such a big decision they should allow GMOA to participate in this case. The court rejected the GMOA's reguest. It was a planned one. If the court did have a good intention then they should call for all the affected parties and the parties that will affect. you can say that judges acted according to the order of constitution. But If judges needed they could have found a pathway around it. Whatever it is now they gave a decision. Don't try to say that the judges are innocent. I am not saying that the GMOA is right. GMOA have some sort of bad habit on intervening everything they can see. I am not saying that the everything done by the GMOA is correct but in this situation they should act. someone should act. this is the most idiotic court judgement ever.. It doesn't matter that whether the judges acted according to constitution or not. They have made a decision that will affect badly on country's health sector. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom