Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Edward Kenway" data-source="post: 21236391" data-attributes="member: 522682">You have no proof that court did have an internal agenda plus you agreed what they did was correct according to the law so no. Yes i'm factually correct thanks for admitting and only facts matter not anecdotes.No. This is matter between SLMC and SAITM. GMOA is just a trade union nothing more. Since when courts let trade unions to interfere with courts proceedings? GMOA might think they have special privileges but in reality no they don't.Courts do not want to prove their innocence to GMOA or you <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> it's other way around. As you agreed they did their constitutional duty as it should be. no they did not pander to GMOA as you want but that's how it should be. it's just your opinion. nobody cares. get a life. You are stupid beyond recovery mate. did you just say acting according to the highest law of the country don't matter? Courts sole responsibility is to act according to the law and they did it.</blockquote>

Top Bottom