Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Tuesday at 2:11 PM
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Sunday at 3:05 AM
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Jun 11, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Science Vs Buddhism
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Y2K" data-source="post: 10991877" data-attributes="member: 35049"><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><strong>What does the Buddha say about the origin of the universe? </strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"> </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">It is interesting that the Buddha’s explanation of the origin of the universe corresponds very closely to the scientific view. In the Aganna Sutta, the Buddha described the universe being destroyed and then re-evolving into its present form over a period of countless millions of years. The first life formed on the surface of the water and again, over countless millions of years, evolved from simple into complex organisms. <strong>All these processes are without beginning or end, and are set in motion by natural causes. </strong> <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/shocked.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":shocked:" title="Shocked :shocked:" data-shortname=":shocked:" /></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"><strong>Scientists view</strong></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">Scientists do not 'believe in' theories. They gather evidence for them and build them up with experiment and observation or reject them if there be contradictory evidence. The Big Bang Theory is accepted due to the presence of much evidence, such as: </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson's telescope's hissing, a remnant of radiation from a massively hot early Universe (see Bill Bryson's account in A Short History of Nearly Everything). The static on a television is also a remnant presumably of a hot early state to the Universe.</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">The red-shift of galaxies, implying expansion of the Universe, which extrapolated backwards and combined with General Relativity implies a dense, space-time warped, hot, small beginning to the Universe. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">The ratio of hydrogen to helium in the Universe. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">Another answer, not related to the question. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">There are only two options for the formation of everything: </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">1. Evolution </span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: Indigo">2. Creation (ie by God) </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Y2K, post: 10991877, member: 35049"] [SIZE="5"][B]What does the Buddha say about the origin of the universe? [/B] It is interesting that the Buddha’s explanation of the origin of the universe corresponds very closely to the scientific view. In the Aganna Sutta, the Buddha described the universe being destroyed and then re-evolving into its present form over a period of countless millions of years. The first life formed on the surface of the water and again, over countless millions of years, evolved from simple into complex organisms. [B]All these processes are without beginning or end, and are set in motion by natural causes. [/B] :shocked:[/SIZE] [SIZE="4"][COLOR="Indigo"][B]Scientists view[/B] Scientists do not 'believe in' theories. They gather evidence for them and build them up with experiment and observation or reject them if there be contradictory evidence. The Big Bang Theory is accepted due to the presence of much evidence, such as: Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson's telescope's hissing, a remnant of radiation from a massively hot early Universe (see Bill Bryson's account in A Short History of Nearly Everything). The static on a television is also a remnant presumably of a hot early state to the Universe. The red-shift of galaxies, implying expansion of the Universe, which extrapolated backwards and combined with General Relativity implies a dense, space-time warped, hot, small beginning to the Universe. The ratio of hydrogen to helium in the Universe. Another answer, not related to the question. There are only two options for the formation of everything: 1. Evolution 2. Creation (ie by God) [/COLOR][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Asuwa dahayen wadi kalama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom