Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
හොඳ, දැන්වීම්-රහිත (ad-free) ආයුර්වේද ඇප් එකක් සොයා ගැනීමට නොහැකි වූ නිසා, මමම එකක් නිර්මාණය කළා
kitchen_discussions
Updated:
Today at 2:34 AM
Ad icon
Iptv
musicking
Updated:
Sunday at 9:52 AM
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Jul 19, 2026
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Scientists Intercept Signal That Took 8 Billion Years to Reach Earth
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 29309036" data-attributes="member: 562115"><p>Yes... It is questionable. It's <strong>only a theory</strong> and was proposed by Prof Rajendra Gupta (University of Ottawa) to address the existence stars like <strong>Methuselah</strong> which seems to be older than the Universe. Methuselah- or HD140283 was a staggering 16 billion years old as estimated by the ESA satellite data. It's about 190.1 light years from us. <strong> But how can a star be older than the Universe?</strong></p><p></p><p>(<strong>Note</strong>: Methuselah was the oldest man lived on Earth according to the Hebrew Old Testament - supposedly lived for 967 years or so - so the star was named after him because it was the oldest)</p><p></p><p>So Gupta suggested Zwicky’s Tired Light theory, which proposes that the redshift of light from distant galaxies is caused by the gradual energy loss of photons over vast cosmic distances. By allowing this theory to coexist with the expanding universe, Gupta suggests a hybrid interpretation of redshift that explains the observations more accurately.</p><p>Additionally, Gupta incorporates the concept of evolving “coupling constants,” as theorised by Paul Dirac, which are fundamental physical constants governing particle interactions. He proposes to change the Cosmological Constant with another which accounts for the evolution of Coupling Constants.</p><p>(Note: Some scientists suggest that the Tired light theory should be Re-tired. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite18" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL :ROFLMAO:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" /> )</p><p></p><p>But later observations from Hubble placed placed Methuselah to be around 14 Billion years old which is more or less near enough. More recent estimates using JPL, MESA data place Methuselah to be around 12 Billion years old. (<strong>12.01 ± 0.05 Gyr</strong>)</p><p></p><p>More accurate estimates will be made with new data hopefully. There are other stars like Methuselah but so far the Big-Bang isn't disproved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="imhotep, post: 29309036, member: 562115"] Yes... It is questionable. It's [B]only a theory[/B] and was proposed by Prof Rajendra Gupta (University of Ottawa) to address the existence stars like [B]Methuselah[/B] which seems to be older than the Universe. Methuselah- or HD140283 was a staggering 16 billion years old as estimated by the ESA satellite data. It's about 190.1 light years from us. [B] But how can a star be older than the Universe?[/B] ([B]Note[/B]: Methuselah was the oldest man lived on Earth according to the Hebrew Old Testament - supposedly lived for 967 years or so - so the star was named after him because it was the oldest) So Gupta suggested Zwicky’s Tired Light theory, which proposes that the redshift of light from distant galaxies is caused by the gradual energy loss of photons over vast cosmic distances. By allowing this theory to coexist with the expanding universe, Gupta suggests a hybrid interpretation of redshift that explains the observations more accurately. Additionally, Gupta incorporates the concept of evolving “coupling constants,” as theorised by Paul Dirac, which are fundamental physical constants governing particle interactions. He proposes to change the Cosmological Constant with another which accounts for the evolution of Coupling Constants. (Note: Some scientists suggest that the Tired light theory should be Re-tired. :ROFLMAO: ) But later observations from Hubble placed placed Methuselah to be around 14 Billion years old which is more or less near enough. More recent estimates using JPL, MESA data place Methuselah to be around 12 Billion years old. ([B]12.01 ± 0.05 Gyr[/B]) More accurate estimates will be made with new data hopefully. There are other stars like Methuselah but so far the Big-Bang isn't disproved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom