Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ela_eluwa120" data-source="post: 10861381" data-attributes="member: 193664">You were pointing out that Y2K's disbelief of people who live for 80,000 years is illogical since he is a theist. I don't think that Y2K's belief in God while he is disbelieving 80,000 year living men is hypocrisy as long as he is at least a bit rational. A person need not to reconsider his believes when he is choosing whether or not to believe in a 80,000 year old living man. Eh?  So, I think  whether Y2K is a theist or an atheist does not matter when it comes to 80,000 year living men. Since it is clear that Y2K's belief in God does not imply he should believe in 80,000 year living men, charging him of inconsistency is just an ad hominem circumsential.Notice that a person believing in God need not to base his or her belief in faith. There are people who base their theism on faith. On the other hand, there are people who base their theism on reason as well. As any other religion, Buddhism, also has a place for faith in it though it is less intense.I personally don't believe in people who live for 80,000 years. The fact that some systems are duarable does not imply that human body is a such durable system. Eh?</blockquote>

Top Bottom