Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nash_Node" data-source="post: 2099488" data-attributes="member: 91200">Actually, your reply about Logic is quite facinating, but on the same time quite disgruntful and absolutely worthless peice of shit as well <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />LOGIC, as in human form does not END in simple binary choises. I am not heavly into computers, but all I can say from what I know is that " you got your byets twisted"<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> As with the entire continuation from my First post and... After you started replying to me, what's happening is that... YOU are getting your LOGIC wrong.Example : What my reply was to RAPA...is simply denoting that I was not talking about LOGIC rather "Formal Arguments"However, what you only saw is the word LOGIC, .. Scanned your brain and hit apone a node that you "KNOW" something about PC Logic.. and simply bluttered it out here.That my friend is utter stupidness and sheer arrogence. Becaue you REPLY to something which was never talked about !</blockquote>

Top Bottom