Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
GOOGLE AI PRO - 18 Month - Rs.500.00
Sanathbh
Updated:
Today at 8:25 PM
📸 SIGMA 85mm F1.4 DG HSM | Art — Nikon Mount
romeshnonis
Updated:
Yesterday at 3:56 PM
Ad icon
Singapore V2Ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Monday at 9:03 PM
Plan your Crypto & Forex entries before you take the trade
romeshnonis
Updated:
Monday at 3:20 AM
RHCSA, RHCE, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes Training
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Sep 8, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
SLT SLOW
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="greenthunder" data-source="post: 12598267" data-attributes="member: 297213"><p>Then its Lankabells duty to either limit giving unlimited subscriptions or impose a "fair" FUP. But they won't have the legal problem that SLT is having regarding their old unlimited subscribers .So they can do pretty much anything they want! Therefor as I see it, its safer to stay with SLT rather than shift to Lankabell. But Staying with SLT has its own cons, like ridiculous speed drop etc...</p><p>Yes, bringing up a higher bandwidth limit is much better than throttling or tampering with users internet experience.</p><p>About 8Mbps connection, I think the whole idea of this connection is to attract existing unlimited users, thus earn more profits and get rid of heavy users. But they should have gone for a higher limit like 40GB(peak) rather than 25 GB. Then their plan would have worked much more effectively.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="greenthunder, post: 12598267, member: 297213"] Then its Lankabells duty to either limit giving unlimited subscriptions or impose a "fair" FUP. But they won't have the legal problem that SLT is having regarding their old unlimited subscribers .So they can do pretty much anything they want! Therefor as I see it, its safer to stay with SLT rather than shift to Lankabell. But Staying with SLT has its own cons, like ridiculous speed drop etc... Yes, bringing up a higher bandwidth limit is much better than throttling or tampering with users internet experience. About 8Mbps connection, I think the whole idea of this connection is to attract existing unlimited users, thus earn more profits and get rid of heavy users. But they should have gone for a higher limit like 40GB(peak) rather than 25 GB. Then their plan would have worked much more effectively. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom