Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Wednesday at 9:58 PM
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:10 AM
Ad icon
QA Engineer Intern
pramukag
Updated:
Sunday at 6:07 AM
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Jun 25, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Some facts on RAT kits.
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="imhotep" data-source="post: 27338846" data-attributes="member: 562115"><p>Recently there were some posts on RAT accuracy etc and hence this post. RAT kits have a come a long way since it's introduction during the worst pandemic times. At that time some test kits were notoriously error prone with false negatives.</p><p>Now the technology has evolved and we do have quite accurate tests and many countries have got rid of the mandatory PCR testing and rely mostly on the cheaper RAT alternative. Not all the RATs are the same and as with anything else, who produces it matters.</p><p></p><p>There are three main things that matters in<strong> any diagnostic test. - Sensitivity, specificity and pre-test probability. </strong>In this discussion we will assume the infection is Covid.</p><p></p><p><strong>Sensitivity - </strong>How well the diagnostic picks up the disease - When a RAT kits says<strong> 85% sensitivity</strong>, it implies that <strong>if you test 100 people who definitely has Covid</strong>, you will get<strong> 85 positives </strong>and <strong>15 false negatives.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Specificity - </strong>How well the diagnostic correctly identifies the <strong>absence of a disease. </strong>So when a RAT says 98% specificity, it means that <strong>if you test 100 people who are definitely free of COVID</strong>, <strong>98 would test negative</strong> – and <strong>two people would have a “false positive”.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Pre-Test Probability - </strong>This is the disease prevalence...the chance a person has COVID infection based on their clinical symptoms, specific exposure history or even based on the current infection rate in the community.</p><p></p><p>Above all there's<strong> another very important factor.</strong> - <strong>How well the sample is taken, & the timing of the sample</strong></p><p></p><p>There are several videos on the YouTube showing you how to obtain a Nasal or a throat swab. Please refer to these.</p><p></p><p>When it comes to timing - RATs are relatively insensitive early or late in infection and the evidence particular brands<strong> have differing ability to detect the Omicron variant</strong></p><p></p><p>Do NOT perform a RAT within 48 hours of exposure to COVID and preferably wait or repeat between 5–7 days post exposure.</p><p>If your test result is a surprise based on your assessment of pre-test probability - then repeat the test 24–48 hours later or have a PCR test done.</p><p></p><p>Someone was commenting about RAT and the Ct values of a PCR test. Studies done on EU made RAT kits mid 2021 has shown that in direct comparison with the RT-PCR, the RAT kits showed a <strong>sensitivity of 100.0% for Ct values < 25 and 91.8% for Ct values < 30.</strong></p><p></p><p>There are only a very few test kits that can specifically detect Omicron. It mainly depends on how the RAT kits targets the parts of the virus. The Indians (ICMR) recently came up with OmiSure - an Omicron specific RAT which targets both the SGTF & SGMA (S-gene target failure & S-gene mutation amplification)</p><p>The generally available kits does show less sensitivity with Omicron. That's a fact but manufacturers dodge the issue by saying both Yes & No... There can be several reasons for this - proabably the mutations of Omicron itself and/or with the fact that there could be lower viral load on the swab.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="imhotep, post: 27338846, member: 562115"] Recently there were some posts on RAT accuracy etc and hence this post. RAT kits have a come a long way since it's introduction during the worst pandemic times. At that time some test kits were notoriously error prone with false negatives. Now the technology has evolved and we do have quite accurate tests and many countries have got rid of the mandatory PCR testing and rely mostly on the cheaper RAT alternative. Not all the RATs are the same and as with anything else, who produces it matters. There are three main things that matters in[B] any diagnostic test. - Sensitivity, specificity and pre-test probability. [/B]In this discussion we will assume the infection is Covid. [B]Sensitivity - [/B]How well the diagnostic picks up the disease - When a RAT kits says[B] 85% sensitivity[/B], it implies that [B]if you test 100 people who definitely has Covid[/B], you will get[B] 85 positives [/B]and [B]15 false negatives. Specificity - [/B]How well the diagnostic correctly identifies the [B]absence of a disease. [/B]So when a RAT says 98% specificity, it means that [B]if you test 100 people who are definitely free of COVID[/B], [B]98 would test negative[/B] – and [B]two people would have a “false positive”. Pre-Test Probability - [/B]This is the disease prevalence...the chance a person has COVID infection based on their clinical symptoms, specific exposure history or even based on the current infection rate in the community. Above all there's[B] another very important factor.[/B] - [B]How well the sample is taken, & the timing of the sample[/B] There are several videos on the YouTube showing you how to obtain a Nasal or a throat swab. Please refer to these. When it comes to timing - RATs are relatively insensitive early or late in infection and the evidence particular brands[B] have differing ability to detect the Omicron variant[/B] Do NOT perform a RAT within 48 hours of exposure to COVID and preferably wait or repeat between 5–7 days post exposure. If your test result is a surprise based on your assessment of pre-test probability - then repeat the test 24–48 hours later or have a PCR test done. Someone was commenting about RAT and the Ct values of a PCR test. Studies done on EU made RAT kits mid 2021 has shown that in direct comparison with the RT-PCR, the RAT kits showed a [B]sensitivity of 100.0% for Ct values < 25 and 91.8% for Ct values < 30.[/B] There are only a very few test kits that can specifically detect Omicron. It mainly depends on how the RAT kits targets the parts of the virus. The Indians (ICMR) recently came up with OmiSure - an Omicron specific RAT which targets both the SGTF & SGMA (S-gene target failure & S-gene mutation amplification) The generally available kits does show less sensitivity with Omicron. That's a fact but manufacturers dodge the issue by saying both Yes & No... There can be several reasons for this - proabably the mutations of Omicron itself and/or with the fact that there could be lower viral load on the swab. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom