Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
ඔයාගෙ Assignment හෝ Thesis එක හරියට හදාගමු
ErMurazor
Updated:
Saturday at 10:52 PM
Ad icon
BlackWall V2ray servers
hu KANNA
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:58 AM
Peppa Pig Family Plush Toy Set – 5 Characters
anil1961
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Ad icon
Express VPN PC - 1 Year Rs. 600.00
Sanathbh
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Ad icon
Capcut Pro 7 Days Team Plan - Rs. 3️⃣0️⃣0️⃣
Sanathbh
Updated:
Sep 19, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
ElaKiri.com
News and Updates
South Korea's Severe Stock Market Crash 🇰🇷💱📉
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hesian99" data-source="post: 31533536" data-attributes="member: 575490"><p>Tpus are a different game betting future on tpus would be a huge mistake for google cuz the frontier has been going away from just hyper speed matrix multiplications</p><p></p><p>nvidia does have a huge monopoly, just not on chips, now the chinese use their own chips for some of inference, they are not as optimized as nvidia but for inference it's not gonna be a huge issue, at least for them, nvidia has a big monopoly also on cuda and the whole ecosystem around their gpus which is far more interesting. they were saying for a lot of time china actually can replace asml's euv tech but they have repeatedly failed to do it, i dont think they will have a huge development in there anytime soon, even if they do cuda is irreplaceable for some more years</p><p></p><p>but this is WRONG</p><p>"Infrastructure and the application layers are where the real value is (not the models itself)"</p><p>if that is true china wouldnt be much of a threat to us than they are now, with all dario tryna ban open weight and all those scenarios.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">scaling is working and it will continue to work in the future but scaling alone wont get us anywhere, </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px">breeding faster and faster horses doesnt mean you will get a locomotive</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hesian99, post: 31533536, member: 575490"] Tpus are a different game betting future on tpus would be a huge mistake for google cuz the frontier has been going away from just hyper speed matrix multiplications nvidia does have a huge monopoly, just not on chips, now the chinese use their own chips for some of inference, they are not as optimized as nvidia but for inference it's not gonna be a huge issue, at least for them, nvidia has a big monopoly also on cuda and the whole ecosystem around their gpus which is far more interesting. they were saying for a lot of time china actually can replace asml's euv tech but they have repeatedly failed to do it, i dont think they will have a huge development in there anytime soon, even if they do cuda is irreplaceable for some more years but this is WRONG "Infrastructure and the application layers are where the real value is (not the models itself)" if that is true china wouldnt be much of a threat to us than they are now, with all dario tryna ban open weight and all those scenarios. [SIZE=5]scaling is working and it will continue to work in the future but scaling alone wont get us anywhere, breeding faster and faster horses doesnt mean you will get a locomotive[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom