Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mizt" data-source="post: 1929457" data-attributes="member: 84102">Read this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/angry.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angry:" title="Angry    :angry:" data-shortname=":angry:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/angry.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angry:" title="Angry    :angry:" data-shortname=":angry:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/angry.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angry:" title="Angry    :angry:" data-shortname=":angry:" />1) Current state:In S60v3, Symbian implemented a security mechanism: applications need to be signed in order to access some services.A developper can self-sign his own applications, but the most critical services need a powerful certificate, which not everyone can afford.For example, you can not make a file browser able to access c:\sys . This is not very important, but some people feels that they should be ableto do anything they want.2) The theory:When a program is signed and you install it, its privileges are stored in a internal folder. When the program is executed andtries to access a service, the privileges are checked. If they don't match, the service can not be executed, and gives an error.In the PC emulator for Symbian, it is possible to overrride this, so that missing privileges give a warning, not an error.This is controlled through a file called EPOC.INI that includes a line likePlatSecEnforcement OFFIn the phone, this is not modifiable directly.The routine controlling this is calledDProcess:<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />oHasCapability(TCapability , char const)</blockquote>

Verification: Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)

Top Bottom