Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Saturday at 8:07 AM
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Tamils angered over death-on canadian media's
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wakeupcall" data-source="post: 920292" data-attributes="member: 57444"><p>New Delhi, Nov. 5: Can coalitions provide the unity of purpose that nation-states need, Manmohan Singh asked today.</p><p></p><p>The Prime Minister answered the question himself: “Sometimes… narrow political considerations, based on regional or sectional loyalties and ideologies, can distort the national vision and sense of collective purpose.”</p><p></p><p>His sharpest criticism yet of a model where “parties with varying national reach and many with a very limited sub-national reach form a coalition” came before a world audience. Singh was inaugurating an international conference on federalism.</p><p></p><p>Although the Prime Minister, who heads a multi-party coalition, did not raise specific issues, the backdrop was stark. He has made known his disappointment with UPA allies — the DMK, RJD and the NCP — for opposing the nuclear deal in public after endorsing it in the Union cabinet. </p><p></p><p>Singh’s reference to “parties with varying national reach” could be interpreted to mean the Left, which has often drawn charges of wielding power disproportionate to its limited presence in the country.</p><p></p><p>The nuclear deal is not the only sticking point in the Congress’s equations with regional allies. <strong>The DMK’s open declaration of solidarity with the LTTE — after its political cell chief Thamilselvan was killed recently — has caused the Congress discomfiture. The militant group is blamed for Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination</strong>. </p><p></p><p>The running feud between health minister Anbumani Ramadoss of the PMK and the AIIMS director has also embarrassed the Prime Minister.</p><p></p><p>If Singh’s criticism took in its sweep his UPA and Left allies, it did not spare the BJP either. The Opposition party has thwarted the formulation of a cohesive view on the deal after initially giving the impression of support.</p><p></p><p>Without naming the BJP, he asked: “Does a single party have any advantages in managing Centre-state relations smoothly… or is a multi-party model, with national parties dominating the political scene, superior where one can hope that all of them will take a national view on policy issues and help to reinforce the unity of the federation.”</p><p></p><p>While in theory this model should work smoothly, it was not so in India, he said.</p><p></p><p>Congress sources said his comments would resurrect the debate on coalitions versus single-party rule that often dominated party meetings till Sonia Gandhi ruled in favour of alliances before the 2004 elections. The All India Congress Committee is due to meet on November 17. </p><p></p><p>In a tangential answer to the Left’s allegation that the nuclear deal would “compromise” India’s sovereignty, Singh said that in a world getting increasingly globalised, he wondered “whether the day is not far away when the concept of absolute sovereignty may itself come into question”.</p><p></p><p>The context was not the deal but economic development.</p><p><a href="http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071106/asp/frontpage/story_8517049.asp" target="_blank">http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071106/asp/...ory_8517049.asp</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wakeupcall, post: 920292, member: 57444"] New Delhi, Nov. 5: Can coalitions provide the unity of purpose that nation-states need, Manmohan Singh asked today. The Prime Minister answered the question himself: “Sometimes… narrow political considerations, based on regional or sectional loyalties and ideologies, can distort the national vision and sense of collective purpose.” His sharpest criticism yet of a model where “parties with varying national reach and many with a very limited sub-national reach form a coalition” came before a world audience. Singh was inaugurating an international conference on federalism. Although the Prime Minister, who heads a multi-party coalition, did not raise specific issues, the backdrop was stark. He has made known his disappointment with UPA allies — the DMK, RJD and the NCP — for opposing the nuclear deal in public after endorsing it in the Union cabinet. Singh’s reference to “parties with varying national reach” could be interpreted to mean the Left, which has often drawn charges of wielding power disproportionate to its limited presence in the country. The nuclear deal is not the only sticking point in the Congress’s equations with regional allies. [b]The DMK’s open declaration of solidarity with the LTTE — after its political cell chief Thamilselvan was killed recently — has caused the Congress discomfiture. The militant group is blamed for Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination[/b]. The running feud between health minister Anbumani Ramadoss of the PMK and the AIIMS director has also embarrassed the Prime Minister. If Singh’s criticism took in its sweep his UPA and Left allies, it did not spare the BJP either. The Opposition party has thwarted the formulation of a cohesive view on the deal after initially giving the impression of support. Without naming the BJP, he asked: “Does a single party have any advantages in managing Centre-state relations smoothly… or is a multi-party model, with national parties dominating the political scene, superior where one can hope that all of them will take a national view on policy issues and help to reinforce the unity of the federation.” While in theory this model should work smoothly, it was not so in India, he said. Congress sources said his comments would resurrect the debate on coalitions versus single-party rule that often dominated party meetings till Sonia Gandhi ruled in favour of alliances before the 2004 elections. The All India Congress Committee is due to meet on November 17. In a tangential answer to the Left’s allegation that the nuclear deal would “compromise” India’s sovereignty, Singh said that in a world getting increasingly globalised, he wondered “whether the day is not far away when the concept of absolute sovereignty may itself come into question”. The context was not the deal but economic development. [url="http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071106/asp/frontpage/story_8517049.asp"]http://www.telegraphindia.com/1071106/asp/...ory_8517049.asp[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom