Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mujaahid" data-source="post: 7779906" data-attributes="member: 287099">Fourth, moonquakes are no indication of the Moon-split, at least not recently. The seismic activity is recorded about 100 millionth of Earth’s seismic activity actually is generated due to smaller impacts, and not because of significant internal processes.  What observable results on the Moon would you expect when the underquestion moonquake was so intense that it could nicely overcome the force of gravity of such a large celestial body? Moonquake and Moon-split are events of completely different magnitudes, so their effects on Moon must also be theorized differently. If we found the evidence of moonquake, is this enough evidence of Moon-split? A semi-skilled not-so-careful individual can theorize the event illogically, misinterpret the data, and harm the concepts of laymen.<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rolleyes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Rolleyes    :rolleyes:" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />In a small telescope, if you observe closely,this kind of lines, or more appropriately ‘Ray Systems’, are also found in other parts of Moon, at different angles and places, and typically are the surface-related features. They form when the asteroids outburst the lunar material away from the impact in the shape of spikes, destined to last billions of yearsref: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/11484672/The-Holy-Moons-Split" target="_blank">http://www.scribd.com/doc/11484672/The-Holy-Moons-Split</a>pls do not insult to the science because of your blind faith  ...<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/yes.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":yes:" title="Yes    :yes:" data-shortname=":yes:" /></blockquote>

Verification: Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom