Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Veritas Blue" data-source="post: 8310606" data-attributes="member: 308634">Islamic scholars are incapable of thus far (and have been for the last 1400 years) of forming cogent arguments. Any kind of argumentation is rendered void by fallacies, as seen here in your post as well.I love how you say in 1) That Bible scholars say the Bible has been edited, etc.? Sorry, which scholars have said this ? Can you provide some credible sources to back this up?Remember, conjecture and hearsay and neither arguments, nor evidence. Uniting Arabia? Are you kidding me? Perhaps when you have lived in a few countries in the middle-east you will understand how un-united they are, and have been for a few hundred years.In either case, anyone with a rational mind can argue that Europe was united by Christianity, so was Latin America and North America. So that really puts your argument in a precarious position doesn't it? As it doesn't really mean much in the bigger picture.Most of your "examples" are not examples, they are opinions, and largely misguided opinions at that. You have not provided any evidence for the statements that require evidence (such as your first point) and some of your points like (uniting arabia) fall into the fallacy of "ignoratio elenchi" - in other words, it's a red herring, it has nothing to do with the context of what you're arguing about.</blockquote>

Top Bottom