Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="x-pert" data-source="post: 3484022" data-attributes="member: 837"><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /> What's the difference between Osama killing people saying it is to protect their religion and the above comment? He must have thought that there is no other option to protect Muslims other than killing the rest.... So what's the different between you two if you both thinks the same way? For me, killing is NO WAY an option for ANYTHING. Religion is not what matters, but religiousness according to Diyathi <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /> නහී වේරේන වේරාණීAndසියලු සත්වයෝ නිදුක් වෙත්වා, නීරෝගී වෙත්වා, සුවපත් වෙත්වා... </blockquote>

Top Bottom