Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pessimist" data-source="post: 25012751" data-attributes="member: 566496"><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" />referred and read. the question is have u read anything on the demarcation problem <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/lol.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="LOL    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> i know your kind very well sweaty. u lot thinks there's a sharp line diving science from non-science. u dont even understand the seriousness of the issue. see that fella above ? he said non-scientific is when u can't reproduce the observations <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" /> Observations. Im sure u think along the same lines. u need to refer to those resources u just mentioned and try to understand at least few sentences at a time/.</blockquote>

Top Bottom