Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chanster" data-source="post: 1200117" data-attributes="member: 53755">i tot you might quote that..... but that's fine anyway...since the facts still remains, the SOUND STILL BETTER... OVERALL!!!!!!and that is not as subjective as you think it was.... it has already been tested by some of my colleagues(a quick blind test)since not all of the cards tested is ASIO native... so we just use Kernel Streaming without using DSPs, from CDs, FLACs, and APEs. using Quad 11L, Z5500, Klipsch promedia, S750, Sennheiser HD600, and Audio Technica A900.so Audigy 2 ZS  has more features than onboard, decent audio qualities and better than onboard overall(it's not as bad as you think it is, but still worse than the rest of onboard)my question is... have you compare them before? or have you actually heard Audigy 2 ZS audio performance before?if yes, can i ask you with what media player and which configuration did you test it?as i can post all the test details on the test i had done.i may not be as good as you in technical mumbo jumbo... hell no... but i do know which one is better and which one is worse.that my friend, i can guarantee you.N r u so dumb?? who said anything about a E6600? CPU n Audio Processor are 2 different things.......CPU=Process DataAudio Processor=Process Audio+ where did u get the info on "sound extracting part is done by the CPU"??</blockquote>

Top Bottom