Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet
Romeshka
Updated:
Today at 12:16 AM
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Friday at 7:43 PM
NURSING , CAREGIVER , HOTEL & BEAUTY COURSES
IVA Para Medical Campus
Updated:
Thursday at 9:24 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys Peppa Pig Family
anil1961
Updated:
Jul 1, 2026
Ad icon
Video Content Creator
pramukag
Updated:
Jun 28, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
US says "LTTE do not pose a "direct" threat to US"
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rapa" data-source="post: 527491" data-attributes="member: 212"><p><strong>LTTE essentially a Sri Lankan group and no "direct" threat to US – Lanka's former US Ambassador</strong></p><p></p><p>Despite LTTE being banned in the US, the rebel group "was essentially a Sri Lankan group and it did not pose a "direct" threat to the US" said the former US Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Jeffrey Lunstead in a report titled 'The United States' Role in Sri Lanka's Peace Process.' He added "US believed that direct talks with the LTTE was the right thing to do."</p><p></p><p>He also said "Direct US-LTTE links in 2003 would have helped in convincing the LTTE to move away from terrorism and depending on the progress made even delisting it as a foreign terrorist organization."</p><p></p><p>Speaking on US' involvement on the peace process he said "With the approval of the rest of the participants, the US chose to be a "tough cop" in the peace process. It talked tough to the LTTE while aiding the Sri Lankan government militarily (though only modestly with $ 1 million in 2006-7). But the US did not marginalize the LTTE politically because it believed that direct talks with the LTTE were the right thing to do, Lunstead stressed.</p><p></p><p>Explaining the US "double speak" on terrorist groups, he said that the LTTE was essentially a Sri Lankan group and it did not pose a "direct" threat to the US."</p><p></p><p>Lunstead added "the US believed that direct talks with the LTTE were the right thing to do."</p><p></p><p>On the US strategic interest in Sri Lanka, especially Trincomalee, he said that US has no such special interest "as many theorists have been speculating."</p><p></p><p>"While the US has a congenial military to military relationship with Sri Lanka, strategic interests of the type present in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan do not exist" he said. "Contrary to the musings of various South Asian theorists, the US does not have, and has never had, any interest in the use of the harbor at Trincomalee for military purposes," he added.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/5739" target="_blank">http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/5739</a></p><p>- Asian Tribune -</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rapa, post: 527491, member: 212"] [B]LTTE essentially a Sri Lankan group and no "direct" threat to US – Lanka's former US Ambassador[/B] Despite LTTE being banned in the US, the rebel group "was essentially a Sri Lankan group and it did not pose a "direct" threat to the US" said the former US Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Jeffrey Lunstead in a report titled 'The United States' Role in Sri Lanka's Peace Process.' He added "US believed that direct talks with the LTTE was the right thing to do." He also said "Direct US-LTTE links in 2003 would have helped in convincing the LTTE to move away from terrorism and depending on the progress made even delisting it as a foreign terrorist organization." Speaking on US' involvement on the peace process he said "With the approval of the rest of the participants, the US chose to be a "tough cop" in the peace process. It talked tough to the LTTE while aiding the Sri Lankan government militarily (though only modestly with $ 1 million in 2006-7). But the US did not marginalize the LTTE politically because it believed that direct talks with the LTTE were the right thing to do, Lunstead stressed. Explaining the US "double speak" on terrorist groups, he said that the LTTE was essentially a Sri Lankan group and it did not pose a "direct" threat to the US." Lunstead added "the US believed that direct talks with the LTTE were the right thing to do." On the US strategic interest in Sri Lanka, especially Trincomalee, he said that US has no such special interest "as many theorists have been speculating." "While the US has a congenial military to military relationship with Sri Lanka, strategic interests of the type present in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan do not exist" he said. "Contrary to the musings of various South Asian theorists, the US does not have, and has never had, any interest in the use of the harbor at Trincomalee for military purposes," he added. [url]http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/5739[/url] - Asian Tribune - [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom